On 03/01/2010 02:04 PM, Romain Francois wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2010 01:48 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> On 1 March 2010 at 12:20, Romain Francois wrote:
>> | Hello,
>> |
>> | I'm starting to find the Named construct somewhat too verbose and I'd
>> | like to add some syntactic sugar.
>> |
>> | I'v
On 03/01/2010 01:48 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 1 March 2010 at 12:20, Romain Francois wrote:
> | Hello,
> |
> | I'm starting to find the Named construct somewhat too verbose and I'd
> | like to add some syntactic sugar.
> |
> | I've commited something just now. I'd like to ear opinions abo
On 1 March 2010 at 12:20, Romain Francois wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I'm starting to find the Named construct somewhat too verbose and I'd
| like to add some syntactic sugar.
|
| I've commited something just now. I'd like to ear opinions about it.
|
| The machinery is built around the classes
| Rcpp
