My two cents:
That seems sensible; an alternative view would be to say that sugar is
in the same vein as the rest of Rcpp, might regularly be used in the
same code, and the goal should be to keep everything as simple as
possible (i.e. one library). I, for one, don't see the need to
separate them.
Le 01/11/10 06:13, Dominick Samperi a écrit :
Comments on Sugar...
Rcpp sugar seems to be an enhancement for C++ more than an interface
function,
so wouldn't it make sense to maintain it as a separate C++ class library?
not to me. sugar brings (parts of the) R syntax at the C++ level, it
seem
Doesn't sugar require Rcpp vectors, which encapsulate R SEXP vectors? If
that is the case you really cannot separate them at all since there is a
direct dependency on R.
-Andrew
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Shane Conway wrote:
> My two cents:
>
> That seems sensible; an alternative view wou
Le 01/11/10 15:57, Shane Conway a écrit :
My two cents:
That seems sensible; an alternative view would be to say that sugar is
in the same vein as the rest of Rcpp, might regularly be used in the
same code, and the goal should be to keep everything as simple as
possible (i.e. one library). I, f
Le 01/11/10 16:00, Andrew Redd a écrit :
Doesn't sugar require Rcpp vectors, which encapsulate R SEXP vectors?
If that is the case you really cannot separate them at all since there
is a direct dependency on R.
-Andrew
It is more like both Rcpp vectors and sugar functions both depend on the
What is a good place to start reading about using the newly installed
reference classes in R to interface with Rcpp?
___
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> What is a good place to start reading about using the newly installed
> reference classes in R to interface with Rcpp?
To answer my own question, the "Rcpp Modules" vignette.
___
Rcpp-devel mailing
On 1 November 2010 at 10:26, Douglas Bates wrote:
| What is a good place to start reading about using the newly installed
| reference classes in R to interface with Rcpp?
>From the R side, John usually points to ?ReferenceClasses, and so does the
NEWS file for R 2.12.0.
>From the Rcpp side, the
Le 01/11/10 16:34, Douglas Bates a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
What is a good place to start reading about using the newly installed
reference classes in R to interface with Rcpp?
To answer my own question, the "Rcpp Modules" vignette.
Perhaps it will be on
I'm not sure what causes the error on the netbook. Is this a recent
enough version of Rcpp ?
Also, for the record the code below can now (well with the svn version)
be written in a more sugary way (See also slide 25 of
http://slidesha.re/cDIfp0)
SEXP foo( SEXP x ){
NumericMatrix input( x )
I should probably ask this question on R-devel as it is not directly
an Rcpp question but the thread started here so ...
I'm confused about accessor functions as described in
help("setRefClass") under the argument "fields". It states
The element in the list can alternatively be an _acc
I've attached the file of the errors now. I've also tried to change the
order of includes without much success.
-Andrew
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 29 October 2010 at 16:26, Andrew Redd wrote:
> | I have a class that I am building that I want to interface t
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> I should probably ask this question on R-devel as it is not directly
> an Rcpp question but the thread started here so ...
>
> I'm confused about accessor functions as described in
> help("setRefClass") under the argument "fields". It states
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> I should probably ask this question on R-devel as it is not directly
> an Rcpp question but the thread started here so ...
>
> I'm confused about accessor functions as described in
> help("setRefClass") under the argument "fields". It states
On 11/1/10 12:28 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
I should probably ask this question on R-devel as it is not directly
an Rcpp question but the thread started here so ...
I'm confused about accessor functions as described in
help("setRefClass") under the argument "fields". It states
The e
15 matches
Mail list logo
