[TANKS] Re: Servo hacking.

2009-06-05 Thread Paul Hilton
Frank Pitelli wrote: > A hacked servo as a rotate motor would probably only work if you have a > very large (ie. expensive) servo. A cheap, powerful motor, with two > micro-switches and a cheap servo works far better. Or, you can splurge > and get an R/C relay switch and use that with a cheap, p

[TANKS] Re: Self Propelled Artillery?

2009-06-05 Thread Chrysanthos Kanellopoulos
is asset will qualify as a "four hit tank" with the frontal hit exclusion. The obvious large bore will allow it to carry 40 rounds of ammo in it's magazine. Steve "If I Build It, It will Shoot Moving or Not" Tyng;-) __ Information from ESET

[TANKS] Re: Self Propelled Artillery?

2009-06-05 Thread Derek Engelhaupt
It would be extremely cool, but alas it was a prototype that was never completed. Would classify as a tank, but against the rules since it was only a prototype. I'm sure if you built it someone would be willing to shoot paint at it;) Derek T065 On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Kelly G wro

[TANKS] Re: 25-pounder Gun

2009-06-05 Thread jvragu47
On Jun 5, 3:12 pm, Mike Måne wrote: > I've always adored the German Pak 40 AT gun. That's not really a howitzer or > artillery for that matter. Hasn't a member build one? > > Yes, I built one years ago. It was transformed into the Flak 88mm. It was the first asset to use a door actuator that I

[TANKS] Re: Self Propelled Artillery?

2009-06-05 Thread Kelly G
Hey, Anyone ever considered making one of these... Would it qualify as a tank? It kind of looks like the Bismark with tracks on it. I just wonder if there would be a battle field big enough for it? Makes the King Tiger look like a Tonka Toy Also, ya might need to take out a second mortgage ju

[TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ?

2009-06-05 Thread Tod jones
The one with the rubber baby buggy bumpers? ;) My 67 Triumph has manual windows too. Dont all true sportscars? - Original Message - From: "Clark Ward Jr" To: Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 6:40 PM Subject: [TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ? > > I have manual windows in my 1975 MGB

[TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ?

2009-06-05 Thread Modena
the real (read: only) benefit to power windows (apart from curing laziness) is the auto-up/auto-down, much more convenient, and safer too On Jun 6, 8:40 am, Clark Ward Jr wrote: > I have manual windows in my 1975 MGB roadster... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You are curre

[TANKS] Re: 25-pounder Gun

2009-06-05 Thread Mike Måne
That sounds like an easy beginning to the hobby. I might just look into building a wired gun... -Mike M 2009/6/5 Derek Engelhaupt > Yup, the Navarone gun uses a wired controller: > http://www.rctankcombat.com/field-artillery/FA003/18Controls-large.jpg > > Derek > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:12

[TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ?

2009-06-05 Thread Clark Ward Jr
I have manual windows in my 1975 MGB roadster... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.co

[TANKS] Re: 25-pounder Gun

2009-06-05 Thread Derek Engelhaupt
Yup, the Navarone gun uses a wired controller: http://www.rctankcombat.com/field-artillery/FA003/18Controls-large.jpg Derek On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Mike Måne wrote: > I've always adored the German Pak 40 AT gun. That's not really a howitzer > or artillery for that matter. Hasn't a membe

[TANKS] Re: Servo hacking.

2009-06-05 Thread Frank Pittelli
Mike Lyons wrote: > Some lessons from the School of Hard Knocks: > > [Snipped - 11 detailed and wise pieces of advice for servo hacking] > Here are some lessons from the School of Cheap Solutions regarding the use of a standard motor and micro-switches configured as a MAG Speed Control (http

[TANKS] Re: 25-pounder Gun

2009-06-05 Thread Mike Måne
I've always adored the German Pak 40 AT gun. That's not really a howitzer or artillery for that matter. Hasn't a member build one? By the way, since I am new to this hobby, can fixed artillery (eg. "88mm") use direct wired control without using a TX/RC device? -Mike M 2009/6/5 Pureteenlard > >

[TANKS] Re: Servo hacking.

2009-06-05 Thread Mike Lyons
Some lessons from the School of Hard Knocks: 1. Disassemble and assemble over a large flat surface. There are some small pieces that are easy to drop and lose. A table saw makes a very poor workbench for this project, even more so if there is an inch of sawdust under it. 2. When you remove the

[TANKS] Re: Servo hacking.

2009-06-05 Thread Frank Pittelli
Paul Hilton wrote: > Here are some other links to pages depicting the hacking of servos for > continuous rotation. Might be useful for turret rotation. A hacked servo as a rotate motor would probably only work if you have a very large (ie. expensive) servo. A cheap, powerful motor, with two

[TANKS] Servo hacking.

2009-06-05 Thread Paul Hilton
Ok, I'll be the one to start another thread! Here are some other links to pages depicting the hacking of servos for continuous rotation. Might be useful for turret rotation. http://www.embeddedtronics.com/servo.html http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/gadgets/servos/servomod.html http://www.noetic

[TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ?

2009-06-05 Thread Sgt.A.Johnson
Im only fourteen and can operate a manual. Not hard. My dad has manual windows on a 2003 car On Jun 5, 12:36 pm, Peter Arundel wrote: > You do realise that automatic transmissions are an invention of the devil, > don't you? > > > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 07:28:51 -0400 > > From: t...@mac.com > > T

[TANKS] Re: 25-pounder Gun

2009-06-05 Thread Pureteenlard
You could always build one of these instead; http://www.missing-lynx.com/gallery/britain/jpmpheasant-1.jpg A bit more potent when it comes to killing tanks. Pete. On Jun 3, 9:09 pm, Steve Tyng wrote: > Doug wrote: > > Are you planning to build an artillery piece and not a tank, Steve ? > > I'

[TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ?

2009-06-05 Thread Peter Arundel
You do realise that automatic transmissions are an invention of the devil, don't you? > Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 07:28:51 -0400 > From: t...@mac.com > To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com > Subject: [TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ? > > > 2005 Jeep Rubicon, most expensive car I've even owned a

[TANKS] Re: is a regulator important ?

2009-06-05 Thread Thomas Lum
2005 Jeep Rubicon, most expensive car I've even owned and still has crank windows, manual transmission and no vanity mirrors either! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@

[TANKS] Re: Artillery, smaller scales, and other musings.

2009-06-05 Thread HV
Servo City now sells continuous rotation servos. On Jun 5, 6:50 am, Phil wrote: > Talking about converting servos to continuous movement, I found this > site: --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, se

[TANKS] Re: Artillery, smaller scales, and other musings.

2009-06-05 Thread HV
Polystyrene is a nice material that I've worked with in the past. But personally I have no desire to build artillery, as there is little incentive to do so. I think the Kysosho would make a nice platform either for robotics or for smaller scale tanks that have the same functionality as the tamiya

[TANKS] Re: Artillery, smaller scales, and other musings.

2009-06-05 Thread Phil
Talking about converting servos to continuous movement, I found this site: http://www.societyofrobots.com/actuators_modifyservo.shtml Haven't tried it (though I'd like to) but they seem to know what they're doing. Phil Palmer --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You are curre