Ben, we addressed this when Mike Mangus finished his Spartan, which is
a full-tracked armored support vehicle. I think we said it got the
benefit of it's armor, but no immunity in the frontal arc. Not sure,
though.
For an Austalian MRV (the M113 with a Scorpion turret on it), you
could use it
: October-21-10 9:25 AM
To: R/C Tank Combat
Subject: [TANKS] Re: free paper model of the German A7V tank
The A7V would make for an easy vehicle to build. The issue is that at
a max armor of 30mm it only counts as a lightweight under the rules
making it an easy kill at only two hits.
Maybe the founder
rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:24:51 AM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: free paper model of the German A7V tank
The A7V would make for an easy vehicle to build. The issue is that at
a max armor of 30mm it only counts as a lightweight under the rules
making it an easy kill
.
- Doug
- Original Message -
From: Steve Tyng steve...@gmail.com
To: R/C Tank Combat rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:24:51 AM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: free paper model of the German A7V tank
The A7V would make for an easy vehicle to build. The issue
that steered me
away from a Bradley was that I didn't want a 3-hit tank.
- Doug
- Original Message -
From: Steve Tyng steve...@gmail.com
To: R/C Tank Combat rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:24:51 AM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: free paper model of the German A7V
Steve wrote I'm OK with this as long as the vehicle is at least 3'
long.
Now here lies a small problem, lets say Frank decided on a rule
change , for simplicity if nothing else.
some tanks are less than 3 long, does that mean the old rules would
apply to them and only them ? if so we have had a
About an hour northeast of Toronto.
-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of neroc
Sent: October-21-10 11:32 AM
To: R/C Tank Combat
Subject: [TANKS] Re: free paper model of the German A7V tank
Steve wrote I'm OK
I agree, perhaps something like this.
tanks over 3' - 4 shots
tanks under 3' - 3 shots
tanks under 2.5' - 2 shots
armored cars over 3' - 3 shots
armored cars under 3' - 2 shots
armored cars under 2' - 1 shot
support vehicles over 3' - 2 shots (if armored)
support vehicles under 3' - 1 shot
support
Uuhh, I thought this was a rule simplification. I'm just
sayin'. :)
Derek
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Cobra afreem...@live.com wrote:
I agree, perhaps something like this.
tanks over 3' - 4 shots
tanks under 3' - 3 shots
tanks under 2.5' - 2 shots
armored cars over
I know what would be simple , a tank takes 4 shots to be destroyed ,
I do realise that Frank would have considered all of this at the
process of dreaming up these rules. the rules have worked perfectly
well so far ,to my knowledge at least.
And I will say that a 2 hit tank can only loose 500 of
In a message dated 10/21/2010 10:58:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
steve...@gmail.com writes:
I'm OK with this as long as the vehicle is at least 3' long. No
reason in giving Mr. Sims and his Quadracycle any more advantages!
Steve
has he ever been in a battle yet?
Chris,
_Odyssey
Yes!
http://rctankcombat.com/statistics/AssetHistory.cgi?type=Support%20Vehicleid=SV003
On Oct 21, 1:13 pm, odysseyslipw...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/21/2010 10:58:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
steve...@gmail.com writes:
I'm OK with this as long as the vehicle is at least
] on behalf
of neroc [funkyne...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 3:59 AM
To: R/C Tank Combat
Subject: [TANKS] Re: free paper model of the German A7V tank
I know what would be simple , a tank takes 4 shots to be destroyed ,
I do realise that Frank would have considered all
13 matches
Mail list logo
