@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that they are
slipping the whole time? Or do I
[mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that they are
slipping the whole time? Or do I misunderstand
Definitely interested in seeing some pics!
-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of George Mastoras
Sent: Tuesday, 18 May 2010 8:24 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Hey all, long
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that they
are slipping the whole time? Or do I misunderstand the technology
vis-a-vis the slipping belt and the cones of a CVT?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Don Shankin dshan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:19 PM,
of it like the gears of
a manual gearbox, with the variability of a CVT.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS
, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that they are
slipping the whole time? Or do I misunderstand the technology vis-a-vis the
slipping belt and the cones of a CVT?
On Sat
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Clark Ward Jr
Sent: Sunday, 16 May 2010 9:26 PM
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that
they are slipping the whole time? Or do I
In a message dated 5/16/2010 11:39:16 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
billw...@gmail.com writes:
A cone-and-belt cvt works like the pulley stacks in a drill press
drive. Only, instead of two sets of pulleys, you have two cones and a
mechanism to keep the belt taut on those cones. Move
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Absolute genius
Aren't CVTs less efficient than geared transmissions, given that they are
slipping the whole time? Or do I misunderstand the technology vis-a-vis the
slipping belt and the cones of a CVT?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Don Shankin dshan...@gmail.com wrote
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Ben Holko b...@holnet.net wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6zE__J0YIU
This thing may revolutionize all transmissions.
--
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To
10 matches
Mail list logo
