Jonathan Rochkind asked:
>How does this [statement of responsibility] serve the user? (Same
>question as always); and How does this aid the system in serving the
>user (new question).
A transcription of what the item *says* about who created it is basic
to serving the user. A transcription of
Wednesdy, February 21, 2007
I think several years ago the late Professor Hans Wellisch of Univ. of
MD library school wrote an article proposing that we do away with inverting
personal names entirely. I'm not sure in what journal.
Regards,
Jim Agenbroad ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:
Mac does a great job of explaining rules of thumb for applying AACR2.
But the questions before us are not how to apply AACR2, they are: How
does this serve the user? (Same question as always); and How does
this aid the system in serving the user (new question). And: How does
this get in the way o
There is an interesting article called 'In Google's broad wake : taking
responsibility for shaping the global digital library' by Richard K. Johnson,
Senior Advisor, Association of Research Libraries, in a special issue, number
250, February 2007, of ARL : a bimonthly report. The web site is ww
... and then there are sound recordings as well -- no statement of
responsibility for unpublished field recordings and often highly diffuse ones
for published recordings. As with video and film, where does one draw the line
between inclusion and exclusion?
Maybe there's a halfway house appro
On 2/21/07, Philip Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is an interesting article called 'In Google's broad wake : taking
responsibility for shaping the global digital library' by Richard K.
Johnson, Senior Advisor, Association of Research Libraries, in a special
issue, number 250, February 2
Antony Gordon wrote:
>.. and then there are sound recordings as well -- no statement of
>responsibility for unpublished field recordings and often highly
>diffuse ones for published recordings. As with video and film, where
>does one draw the line between inclusion and exclusion?
To me, all t
It has been suggested that a reason LC continues to use AMIA for
moving images, is the in AACR2 260$a* is the place of manufacture of
the DVD, as opposed to the place of production of the motion picture.
Isn't this the sort of thing 260$a$b$c$e($f$g) was intended to solve?
Place of production
Elizabeth O'Keefe has doubts about the reliability of scanned images
as substitutes for t.p. transcription. Greta de Grote would welcome
scanned images of video credits as a substitute for transcription.
Some time back on this list, Barbara Tillett mentioned the
availability of scanned images as
Just to clarify: I am actually in favor of continuing the practice of
transcribing the statement of responsibility. It's a simple, low-tech way to
record information that cannot always be conveyed by displaying the controlled
access versions of the names. I would hate to have to depend on scann
I agree that it is sometimes very useful to know exactly how a name or title
appeared on the piece, though i think it's generally more useful for
librarians than patrons (i was a reviewer at WLN--we relied on those
statements of responsiblity to check authority problems--and hoped that
there were
Forwarded message
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:44:34 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. McRee Elrod)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Direct versus inverted order of author names
I hope the RDA editors are following this thread on MARC, and/or the
MARC listo
12 matches
Mail list logo
