Mac wrote:
>Daniel Paradis seems to have a better grasp of what is actually in
>RDA, and how it might be implemented, than most.
The fact that I had some insight to share about preferred titles does not mean
that I have a better grasp of RDA than anybody else on this list, especially
considering
I should also have pointed out that if you would like to start or
participate in a public discussion of this article, you might be
interested in the following blogs:
1. Karen Coyle already has a very thoughtful response to the article
up at her blog at:
http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2009/07
I have read RDA in its draft forms. In re the author, et al., where does it
say that we are not to include them all and make the first one the "primary"
author?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:40 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Daniel Paradis seems to have a better grasp of what is actually in
> RDA, and
Gene Fieg said:
>I have read RDA in its draft forms. In re the author, et al., where does it
>say that we are not to include them all and make the first one the "primary"
>author?
That is what it says. But in doing a retrospective database walk,
there is no way to replace that "[et al.]" with th
Mac wrote:
>What I have not been able to determine, is that in a collection by
>different people, I assume main entry is still title. One would not
>use the author of the first work included as main entry would one?
In the Dec. 2008 draft of RDA, the choice of the authorized access point for
Daniel Paradis said:
>In other words, there was no intention to change the AACR2 rules relating
>to collections, which will be entered under the preferred title.
In most cases under AACR2, compilations of the works of several people
have main entry under title proper. Our clients would not ac
Mac,
You shouldn't rely on the draft on the RDA-L site for what RDA looks like
now. Numerous instructions and examples were modified based on
constituent comments and the JSC meeting in April. All the changes will
be seen in the final version of RDA that is published this winter. The
exampl
Adam Schiff quoted:
>According to AACR2 21.7C1, when a compilation lacks a collective title, it
>is entered under the heading for the first work in the compilation. This
>misrepresents the compilation. In RDA separate access points will be
>constructed for each work in the compilation (RDA 6.27
8 matches
Mail list logo
