John said:
>No, because there is no instruction for including relationship
>designators in authorized access points for works and expressions.
>In any case, any name that is included in such an AAP is by
>definition some kind of creator or one of the categories from 19.3.
By definition isn't an
There are two relationship designator questions SLC needs answering
before September 1st:
First, what relationship code should be used for 111/711 in records
for proceedings? (Having the same designation as the actual writers
of the papers seems strange to me; the conference itself wrote
nothing.
2 matches
Mail list logo
