Kyle Felix asked:
>I want to know what relator term I should use for the chair of a committee.
In the one alphabetical list of relators in the MRIs created by
merging the various lists in RDA, "chairperson" is included. Michael
Gorman and I must have found it in RDA? We square bracketed those
t
I want to know what relator term I should use for the chair of a committee. The
term "chair" is not in the RDA toolkit's list of relationship designators.
Does anybody have any suggestions, please?
Many thanks.
Kyley Felix
Librarian
Parliamentary Library
Parliament House
Harvest Tce
Perth WA 60
Thank you Thomas for letting me know that 380 may be used in
bibliographic records. (One cataloguer reports seeing them in some
records for Blu-rays.)
We don't want to use it if redundant with data in other fields,
particularly 33X. We depend on 008/33 letter codes (added to MARC21
from CanMARC)
Hi Gary,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Gary Oliver wrote:
[...]
> I have an item that has a copyright statement, which includes the
> copyright date (1984) and a publication statement, but no publication date.
> 2.8.6.6 says to supply the date or approximate date of publication.
> There i
MARC Bibliographic has Form of Work as well...
http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd380.html
Many work and expression elements are now found in both bibliographic and
authority records.
While computer file-based resources in MARC are required to have either
LDR/06=m or 006/00=m, that corr
I said:
> 008/06 = d, 008/07-10 = 1984.
Sorry, that's a typo. Date type should be "s".
The same year in dates one and two (with the exception of conitnuing
resources which last only one year) is not helpful I think.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Specia
I said in response to Thomas:
>>The records also clarify that 380 Form of Work is used for "Video
>>games."
>
>According to MARC21, 380 is an authority field. Are you saying we
>should use it in bibliographic records?
I should have posted the 380 link:
http://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/ad380.ht
you wouldn't use "s"? d = dead serial
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
> Gary Oliver asked:
> >I have an item that has a copyright statement, which includes
> >the copyright date (1984)
>
> Use 264 1 $c[1984]
>
> We add 264 4 $c only if the year differs from that in 264
Gary Oliver asked:
>I have an item that has a copyright statement, which includes
>the copyright date (1984)
Use 264 1 $c[1984]
We add 264 4 $c only if the year differs from that in 264 1 $c;
having the same year twice would look strange to patrons it seems to
me.
>How would the relevant 0
Thomas said:
>For LDR/06=m, the preference is to use it in case of doubt, but to
>prefer another code for Type of Record if the aspect brought out
>(language material, music, moving image) is most significant. RDA
>tilts towards two-dimensional moving image as the significant aspect
>for video gam
Thanks. Thomas.
I have not gone through your responses. But I notice that you mentioned 380
form of work. It is possible to give some instructions about the use of 380
field in bibliographic records? I mean in what situations we should use 380
fields.
Many thanks for that in advance.
Joan Wang
I
The two RDA examples for video games on this page are informative:
http://www.loc.gov/catworkshop/RDA%20training%20materials/SCT%20RDA%20Records%20TG/
While LDR/06=m is used, treating the video games as a computer file record
type, that is not reflected exactly in the 336 Content Types. Both re
I am an RDA neophyte, so please bear with me.
In addition to the Toolkit and JSC examples, I was searching the
archives for guidance on dtst and subfield c of the 264 and found this
email. I have an item that has a copyright statement, which includes
the copyright date (1984) and a publicatio
In the example it should be 378$qJohn S.
corey
Hi,
I'm wondering if it's good practice to add initials for personal names in 378$q.
For example,
100 $aJohnson, John,$d1886-1962
378 $aJohn S.
670 $aApples and oranges, 2012:$bcover (John S. Johnson)
In this case the initial for the author was discovered long after the heading
was esta
Katrina Gormley asked:
>What Content/Media/Carrier Types are people using for Video games
336 $acomputer program$2rdacontent
336 $atwo-dimensional moving image$2rdacontent*
336 $aperformed music$2rdaconten * **
336 $aspoken word$2rdacontnt**
336 $atext$2rdacontent**
336 $asounds$2rdaconte
There are often other perceptions involved with individual content types,
according to the RDA-ONIX Framework. The focus is on the intent for how the
content is to be primarily perceived. There can be other incidentals with
content type, including taking the content and using it in other ways th
Respectfully, regarding
"The Content Types "computer program" and "computer dataset" are different in
that the primary processing of the content is done by computers. These would
not be used if the content was created primarily for direct human
perception..."
doesn't really make sense to me.
For Content Type, video games are listed under "two-dimensional moving image".
Content Type refers to the primary human perception involved.
For the authorized access point of the work, video games are treated like
motion pictures, and are grouped under collaborative "moving image works" (RDA
6
I apologize if this has been covered. I searched the archives and didn't find
it anywhere ...
What Content/Media/Carrier Types are people using for Video games (xBox, wii,
Playstation, etc.)?
Content: Computer Program? Computer Program + two-dimensional moving image?
I guess it surprises me
On 27/08/2013 21.51, Kai Li wrote:
Hi everyone,
I wrote a new blog post about RDA's developments in China in the past year
(http://kaili.us/node/53), which I believe some of you may be interested in. I
look forward to hearing your opinions about this post.
Thanks for that. It may be intere
21 matches
Mail list logo
