[RDA-L] 300 $b for still images in volume format

Hi again! I don't think I would write up a content note in 520 since in 336 the content type is clearly defined as still image. Now, for « normal » still images (i.e. pictures on a sheet of paper or other 2D carrier), we never include terms like « ill. » or « images » since it would be redundan

Re: [RDA-L] Illustration terms in 7.15.1.3

Whaha! I am reading my mails backwards and just noticed you already mentionned the confusion between carrier and content :) Marie-Chantal L'Ecuyer-Coelho Bibliothécaire Direction du traitement documentaire des collections patrimoniales Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec 2275, rue Hol

Re: [RDA-L] Illustration terms in 7.15.1.3

Hi! I think it is extremely confusing because, under 3.4.4, "still image" includes paintings (without specifying what the carrier must be), while under 3.5.3, the rule for dimensions only applies to documents "on sheet" (therefore, I assume a painting on canvas, a fresco on plaster slab or an e

Re: [RDA-L] Illustration terms in 7.15.1.3

Hi everyone! I had a very similar case yesterday: a book containing solely illustrations. Some of the illustrations had colour, but most of them were b&w. Since we cannot refer to the illustration in 300$b (RDA defines it as « secondary content »), I wasn't sure how to record the information...

Re: [RDA-L] Capitalization in 2.9.4.4

Hi! Perhaps the solution is to give rare/older materials cataloguers the possibility to record phrases such as « published by » as an optional addition ... Otherwise, the general instruction could simply ask cataloguers to record the name of the publisher, distributer, etc. ... Marie-Chantal

Re: [RDA-L] Date given in an incomplete form

us, incorrect, or incomplete, make a note giving the actual date (see 2.20.6.3). Deborah - - - - - - - - Deborah Fritz TMQ, Inc. debo...@marcofquality.com www.marcofquality.com -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTS

Re: [RDA-L] Date given in an incomplete form

e) +(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax) From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of L'Écuyer-Coelho Marie-Chantal Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:54 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Date given in an incompl

Re: [RDA-L] Date given in an incomplete form

Hi again! The problem is that we are send from 2.7.6 to 1.8, and then, from 1.8 to 1.7. So the same rules seem to apply to all « transcribed » elements (title, statement of responsibility, edition, production statement, etc ...). If characters are missing in a title, I must write up a note; the

Re: [RDA-L] Date given in an incomplete form

13 13:26 À : =?iso-8859-1?Q?L=27=C9cuyer-Coelho_Marie-Chantal?=@kepler.riq.qc.ca; L'Écuyer-Coelho Marie-Chantal Cc : RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Objet : Re: [RDA-L] Date given in an incomplete form Marie-Chantal posted: >I am presently describing an etching. The artist simply wrote 61 ... 264 0

[RDA-L] Date given in an incomplete form

Hi, I am presently describing an etching. The artist simply wrote « 61 » as year of production, under the image. Does it means I must record « 61 » in 264 $c, and then write up a note ? As much as I can tell, we're not allowed to use « 61 [i.e. 1961] » or « [19]61 ». What do you think ?