From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Deborah Fritz
Sent: March-07-13 6:03 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] (OCoLC)829311087
Thomas said: The basic problem is then thrown back to MARC
I come to the collective wisdom looking for guidance.
I have cataloged this record according to RDA standards (I hope!). What
troubles me is the 710 for Polaroid Collections. I have no idea what to use
for the subfield $e except perhaps contributor, and that doesn't seem
correct. The term
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] (OCoLC)829311087
I come to the collective wisdom looking for guidance.
I have cataloged this record according to RDA standards (I hope!). What
troubles me is the 710 for Polaroid Collections. I have no idea what to use
for the subfield $e except perhaps
and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: March-07-13 5:17 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] (OCoLC)829311087
I don't believe there is any relationship designator yet defined in RDA
appropriate for this particular relationship (and lots
www.marcofquality.com
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 5:35 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] (OCoLC)829311087
In looking at the examples
5 matches
Mail list logo