Re: [RDA-L] 300 #e

Marilou Hinchcliff asked: >Is subfield e accompanying materials still allowed in RDA? Yes. 300 +$e is still with us for accompanying material. The LCPS for kits says to pick one component and treat all the other (equally important components) as accompanying material. Our clients would not

Re: [RDA-L] 300 #e

-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Joan Wang Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 1:56 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] 300 #e See LC-PCC PS for 3.1.4 accompanying materials.<http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp3&target=rda3-1777#rda3-1777> The answer is Yes. On

Re: [RDA-L] 300 #e

See LC-PCC PS for 3.1.4 accompanying materials. The answer is Yes. On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Hinchcliff, Marilou wrote: > Is

[RDA-L] 300 #e

Is subfield e accompanying materials still allowed in RDA? I know we’re supposed to mention related works, but I’m not seeing an example of doing it in this manner in 24.4. It looks to me as if they all have to be handled as notes (24.4.3). If we are still allowed to record accompanying mater