Re: [RDA-L] Author affiliations

2013-07-11 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Stan Allen asked: >Does RDA expect us to add more than author names to the 245, such as >Esq., >PH.D., Dr. and even the law firm lawyers are members of at the >time the book >is written? Yes. But some omit institutional affiliations, since they can be mistaken for responsible bodies. Others tra

Re: [RDA-L] Author affiliations

2013-07-11 Thread Goldfarb, Kathie
y, July 11, 2013 9:54 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Author affiliations Stan Allen wrote: Does RDA expect us to add more than author names to the 245, such as Esq., PH.D., Dr. and even the law firm lawyers are members of at the time the book is written? If the in

Re: [RDA-L] Author affiliations

2013-07-11 Thread M. E.
Stan Allen wrote: > Does RDA expect us to add more than author names to the 245, such as Esq., > PH.D., Dr. and even the law firm lawyers are members of at the time the > book is written? > If the info is part of the statement of responsibility as found on the piece, the default RDA rule is to w

[RDA-L] Author affiliations

2013-07-11 Thread Stan Allen
Does RDA expect us to add more than author names to the 245, such as Esq., PH.D., Dr. and even the law firm lawyers are members of at the time the book is written? An example of a record that has caused me confusion is a pcc record cataloged by LC in OCLC, Trial techniques & trials. I have see