Re: [RDA-L] Cross-training from AACR2 ro RDA

Paul Davey asked: >ps 264 - I understand that OCLC allows it, but it's not in their bib = >format. Would it be right that I use 260 by default? PCC says to use 264 rather than 260 in any new RDA record. I hope OCLC will change the RDA test record which have 260. __ __ J. McRee (Mac)

Re: [RDA-L] Cross-training from AACR2 ro RDA

According to PCC guideline, all new RDA records use 264 field. The field is in Library of Congress bib format. www.loc.gov/aba/*pcc*/documents/*264*-*Guidelines*.doc http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd264.html By the way, Library of Congress training materials are comprehensive. They help a

Re: [RDA-L] Cross-training from AACR2 ro RDA

ource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Paul Davey Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:17 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Cross-training from AACR2 ro RDA This is to say I am very grateful for all

[RDA-L] Cross-training from AACR2 ro RDA

This is to say I am very grateful for all the advice and useful links sent. I've looked at it all. Will I die of old age before I finish typing all the extra text necessary? Also (I am speaking as a UK cataloguer), I find it noteworthy that all the help I have been given comes from the US and Can