and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Tillett, Barbara
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:48
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for
community discussion
A word of caution on abandoning undifferentiated name
itution
take a much closer look at the expense of authority control.
Mary Charles
-Original Message-
From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:24 PM
To: Lasater, Mary Charles
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undif
Mary Lasater said:
>That is the NACO practice and has been for many years. We always add
>the date, if known. However, we do not require or encourage the
>cataloger to look for the date.
Giving the date at the outset could save more cataloguer time down the
troad than it would take to find it. I
hey
> could collocate them until they had more concrete differentiating
> information. - Barbara Tillett
>
>
>
> *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA ] *On
> Behalf Of *Myers, John F.
> *Sent:*
Folks:
I'm really glad to see some movement and discussion on this issue. I've
been cranking for some time about how the changes in our environment really
allow us to consider better options on undifferentiated names. The source
of all the problems here is the dual use of name headings as both dis
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Myers, John F.
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 10:56 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for
community discussion
In the main, the thrust of the discussion paper is an obvious im
nd Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 1:31 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for
community discussion
On 4/2/2012 2:23 PM,
and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 1:40 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for
community discussion
I am not a cat
On 4/2/2012 2:23 PM, Jenifer K Marquardt wrote:
Jonathan,
Often there is good information concerning the person available on the item
cataloged such as affiliaton with a particular institution, other titles
published, or place of residence. While this information cannot be used to
establish
Barbara Tillett wrote:
A word of caution on abandoning undifferentiated names. When we were doing the
regional IFLA meetings for the International Cataloguing Principles, the
Chinese told me how glad they would be to have a capability to use
undifferentiated names, as their cataloging code did
Behalf Of Myers, John F.
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 10:56 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal
names: call for community discussion
In the main, the thrust of the discussion paper is an obvious
implication of the ideas in
urce Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] on behalf of Lasater, Mary Charles
[mary.c.lasa...@vanderbilt.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 1:48 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call
Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Myers, John F.
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 10:56 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call
2 12:40 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for
community discussion
I am not a cataloger, but something that's always confused me:
Why do you need an 'authority record' at all for an 'undifferentiated name
ating information. - Barbara
Tillett
*From:*Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Myers, John F.
*Sent:* Monday, April 02, 2012 10:56 AM
*To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
*Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undiffer
Behalf Of Tillett, Barbara
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 11:48 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for
community discussion
A word of caution on abandoning undifferentiated names. When we were doing the
regional IFLA meetings
V.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: [RDA-L] Undifferentiated personal names: call for
community discussion
In the main, the thrust of the discussion paper is an obvious implication of
the ideas in FRAD and of the authority record changes in RDA. It is a
necessary development as we move
In the main, the thrust of the discussion paper is an obvious implication of
the ideas in FRAD and of the authority record changes in RDA. It is a
necessary development as we move from construction of headings to creation of
robust, element-configured authority records as the locus of establish
18 matches
Mail list logo
