Re: [RDA-L] One author, with a single contribution by another author (correction)

@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] One author, with a single contribution by another author (correction) This would be clearer if we were creating clear separate descriptions for the separate entities (e.g. work/expression/manifestation/item descriptions, each linked as appropriate

Re: [RDA-L] One author, with a single contribution by another author (correction)

I guess in RDA it’s not an error to have an author listed in the s.o.r., but to not have an access point for them, so in LCCN 2012544079 LC did not have to add a 700 for the author of the contribution, but I don’t like not adding an access point for a person when they are named in the s.o.r.,

Re: [RDA-L] One author, with a single contribution by another author (correction)

Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Dana Van Meter Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 7:27 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] One author, with a single contribution by another author (correction) I guess in RDA it’s not an error to have

Re: [RDA-L] One author, with a single contribution by another author (correction)

To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] One author, with a single contribution by another author (correction) Ugh, I’m sorry, I also see now that the use of relationship designators isn’t core in RDA, but I’m just curious if you were to use a relationship designator in this case