Quoting Mac. : Some tell me I need not worry about Bibframe I will be dead by
then; wish RDA
could have waited that long!
Can't imagine who'd be qualified to tell you that. For all we know, Bibframe
may be implemented in a few years, not for a long time, even not at all. We
know none of us
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote:
Even Bibframe does not have WEMI
True, but that's BIBFRAME, not RDAFRAME or FRBRFRAME. BIBFRAME, as I've
come to understand it, is trying to be all things to all people.
Supposedly something called application profiles will serve as templates
that lay
-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette
Deborah Fritz said:
But, can anyone think of a better designator to propose than 'producer
and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of M. E.
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 3:34 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette
Deborah Fritz debo...@marcofquality.com wrote
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013, Deborah Fritz wrote:
But, can anyone think of a better designator to propose than 'producer of
reproduction'?
agent responsible for reproduction ?
reproducing entity ?
entity associated with reproduction ?
reproduction agent ?
Just brainstorming here in my office, with
Deborah Fritz debo...@marcofquality.com wrote:
However, there doesn't seem to be a relationship designator for
'producer'; or rather, there is one, but it is assigned to: producer: A
person, family, or corporate body responsible for most of the business
aspects of a production for screen,
Carolyn Phillips said:
I agree with Deborah that Great Lakes Video Services is the producer of
the reproduction, but the definition of the relationship designator
producer as I read it, does not apply.
You are correct there I think. We have introduced manufacturer as a
relationship
I am cataloging a locally produced videodisc reproduction of a
videocassette for our local history department (and will have many more,
as the videocassettes are all being replaced by videodiscs). As I
understand it, the 346 $b is to indicate the broadcast characteristics
of the videodisc. Do
Carolyn Phillips posted:
346 $b is to indicate the broadcast characteristics
of the videodisc. Do I leave this off because I don't know what it is?
I would not use this field. Stick with 538 for that type of information.
The new 34X fields fragment information.
Also, I do not find a
27, 2013 3:54 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette
I am cataloging a locally produced videodisc reproduction of a videocassette
for our local history department (and will have many more, as the
videocassettes are all being
10 matches
Mail list logo
