Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-10-01 Thread Jack Wu
Quoting Mac. : Some tell me I need not worry about Bibframe I will be dead by then; wish RDA could have waited that long! Can't imagine who'd be qualified to tell you that. For all we know, Bibframe may be implemented in a few years, not for a long time, even not at all. We know none of us

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-10-01 Thread M. E.
J. McRee Elrod m...@slc.bc.ca wrote: Even Bibframe does not have WEMI True, but that's BIBFRAME, not RDAFRAME or FRBRFRAME. BIBFRAME, as I've come to understand it, is trying to be all things to all people. Supposedly something called application profiles will serve as templates that lay

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-29 Thread Adam L. Schiff
-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette Deborah Fritz said: But, can anyone think of a better designator to propose than 'producer

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-28 Thread Deborah Fritz
and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of M. E. Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 3:34 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette Deborah Fritz debo...@marcofquality.com wrote

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-28 Thread Adam L. Schiff
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013, Deborah Fritz wrote: But, can anyone think of a better designator to propose than 'producer of reproduction'? agent responsible for reproduction ? reproducing entity ? entity associated with reproduction ? reproduction agent ? Just brainstorming here in my office, with

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-27 Thread M. E.
Deborah Fritz debo...@marcofquality.com wrote: However, there doesn't seem to be a relationship designator for 'producer'; or rather, there is one, but it is assigned to: producer: A person, family, or corporate body responsible for most of the business aspects of a production for screen,

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-27 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Carolyn Phillips said: I agree with Deborah that Great Lakes Video Services is the producer of the reproduction, but the definition of the relationship designator producer as I read it, does not apply. You are correct there I think. We have introduced manufacturer as a relationship

[RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-26 Thread Carolyn Phillips
I am cataloging a locally produced videodisc reproduction of a videocassette for our local history department (and will have many more, as the videocassettes are all being replaced by videodiscs). As I understand it, the 346 $b is to indicate the broadcast characteristics of the videodisc. Do

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-26 Thread J. McRee Elrod
Carolyn Phillips posted: 346 $b is to indicate the broadcast characteristics of the videodisc. Do I leave this off because I don't know what it is? I would not use this field. Stick with 538 for that type of information. The new 34X fields fragment information. Also, I do not find a

Re: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette

2013-09-26 Thread Deborah Fritz
27, 2013 3:54 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Questions for videodisc reproduction of videocassette I am cataloging a locally produced videodisc reproduction of a videocassette for our local history department (and will have many more, as the videocassettes are all being