Bob Maxwell wrote:
"Or perhaps we should record just "Russia" in 370? Is this a case like Adams
(Iowa : Township), where we would just record "Adams, Iowa" in 370, dropping
the type of jurisdiction qualifier (by NACO policy)?"
In AACR2, rule 24.4C1 explicitly asked not to include "the additions
The LC-PCC PS for 11.3.1.3 applies only to the element Place Associated with
the Corporate Body, though. If the practice of omitting the type of
jurisdiction is to be followed for all the elements that are recorded in field
370, I would suggest adopting a similar policy statement for 9.8 (Place
2 matches
Mail list logo