As an art historian (and picture cataloguer), these questions have rattled
around the caverns of my mind for decades. The rule of thumb re the conventions
of art history is similar to Barbara's comment.
That is, if an art work (ie work and expression in frbr talk) is used
inspirationally by
Several months ago, there was a discussion on the PCCList about whether
it was appropriate to add an access point for:
[Artist]. Works. Selections
to a printed monograph that includes reproductions of the artist's
work. The use of conventional collective titles is well-established for
] on behalf of Elizabeth O'Keefe
[eoke...@themorgan.org]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 4:31 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Reproductions of Art Works and FRBR
Several months ago, there was a discussion on the PCCList about whether
it was appropriate to add an access point
This is applicable to all art or arts, music included.
See CCQ, vol. 50 (or 51?) nos. 5-8.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Joan Wang jw...@illinoisheartland.orgwrote:
I agree with Sara. Honestly, I think about the question the whole morning.
Finally I feel that a photography of an original
Each resource contains intellectual or artistic content and there are
relationships between the essence of that content and the
person/family/corporate body responsible for it. The basic work in the FRBR
sense is still there in the photograph, and FRBR makes a relationship between
that
Barbara, Yes. It helps. Thanks for your explanation both in theory and
practice.
Thanks again.
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Barbara Tillett babstill...@me.com wrote:
Each resource contains intellectual or artistic content and there are
6 matches
Mail list logo
