> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Kevin M. Randall
> Sent: December 10, 2010 5:22 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Strait ja
Lisa Hatt wrote:
> Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote:
>
> > And then there's 650 $a Large type books, which seems wrong on so
> > many levels. It's often replaced by the more apt form/genre heading
> > 655 $a Large type books. But the problem is that form and genre are
> > work attributes, not manifesta
2/10/2010 4:35 PM >>>
> -Original Message-> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access> [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Lisa Hatt> Sent: December 10, 2010 4:12 PM> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA> Subject: Re: [RDA-L
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Lisa Hatt
> Sent: December 10, 2010 4:12 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Strait jacket -- examp
Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote:
And then there's 650 $a Large type books, which seems wrong on so
many levels. It's often replaced by the more apt form/genre heading
655 $a Large type books. But the problem is that form and genre are
work attributes, not manifestation attributes
Form is a work att
The 'large print' example is an excellent for pointing out problems with
MARC and problems with what can happen if you start mixing format
information with other kinds of fields (650s, location etc.). It gets
very very messy and RDA IS trying to sort this out.
But I don't think that the problem is
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:rd...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
> Sent: December 10, 2010 11:42 AM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Straight jacket?
>
> I think RDA
7 matches
Mail list logo