On 27/12/2012 18:52, Kevin M Randall wrote:
> It seems to me that the concept of manifestation is no less important when
> considering online resources. And they are certainly not always "exactly the
> same files". For things such as electronic journals, there can be very
> significant differ
ccess
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:44 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Multiple electronic manifestations (was RE: [RDA-L] The
purpose of standards)
Yes, that doesn't surprise me. But the
adata and Enterprise Systems
MIT Libraries
617-253-7137
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:52 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject:
ce Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:52 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] The purpose of standards
James Weinheimer wrote:
> With online resources, everyone is looking at *exact
James Weinheimer wrote:
> With online resources, everyone is looking at *exactly the same files* so
> the utility of even considering an online resource in terms of a
> manifestation may be far less useful.
It seems to me that the concept of manifestation is no less important when
considering on
On 12/21/2012 09:52 PM, Deborah Fritz wrote:
At the risk of sounding even more obsessive-compulsive than Bob, I
offer you this.
and
On 12/21/2012 05:29 PM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote:Here's a postscript
to the discussion (for those of you who still care):
Here's a postscript to the discus
6 matches
Mail list logo