escription and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Fox, Chris
Sent: 26 April 2013 16:58
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Using 344-347?
I've been told that, for now, information in the 34X fields can and
should continue to be duplicated in the 007 an
## $a4:3 $b 25 fps
From: John Williams [mailto:jwilli...@johnshopkins.it]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 1:23 PM
To: 'Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access'
Subject: RE: [RDA-L] Using 344-347?
Also re: films on DVD.
It seems to be agreed that
Also re: films on DVD.
It seems to be agreed that we can use:
345 ## $a laser optical $b NTSC
To indicate the video format of DVDs even though they are digital not
analog.
But where to put aspect ratio? Can we use:
345 ## $a16:9 $b 24 fps
or (for PAL)
345 ## $a4:3 $b 25 fps
5, 2013 1:04 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Using 344-347?
Bernadette O'Reilly asked:
>- whether other agencies expect to use 34X straight away or will
>continue to use 300 $b at least until LC-PCC and specialist bodies
>produce best practice guidelines
SLC wil
Bernadette O'Reilly asked:
>- whether other agencies expect to use 34X straight away or will
>continue to use 300 $b at least until LC-PCC and specialist bodies
>produce best practice guidelines
SLC will continue to use 300 :$b, and will not code 34X, in part for
consistency with legacy records (
log Librarian
University of North Texas
Denton, TX 76203
jean.har...@unt.edu
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Bernadette Mary O'Reilly
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:31 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.
Hello
I need to prepare simple inhouse documentation for non-BK materials and
am wondering whether or how we should use fields 344-347 for sound
recordings, videos, CD-ROMs and suchlike, to cover the details which
used to go in 300 $b.
In the Toolkit the RDA>MARC mapping still points to 300
7 matches
Mail list logo
