Hi, all
I have two questions about authorized access points for
person/family/corporate body.
Q1:
RDA 18.3 says that creator is a core element. If there is more than one,
only the principle or the first-named creator is required. It also says
that other person/family/corporate body associated wi
Hi Joan,
Regarding Q2, I think if the dates of birth/death are not needed to
distinguish the person (and therefore not included in the *authorized
access point* element), the dates would still be recorded as a separate
element (e.g. MARC 046).
-Arthur Liu
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Joa
Hi, Liu
So it does not have to appear in 100/700 fields if it is not needed to
distinguish...But it will be encoded in 046 field as a core element.
Right?
Thank you.
Joan
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Arthur Liu wrote:
> Hi Joan,
>
> Regarding Q2, I think if the dates of birth/death are
Hi Joan,
That's my understanding, yes. (I'm a recently finished MLS student, so take
this with a grain of salt.)
Also, note that the associated LC-PCC PS for 9.19.1.3 says to add the dates
to all new authority records even if not needed to distinguish (in other
words, apply the option).
-Arthur
s point for the movie.
Thomas Brenndorfer
Guelph Public Library
>From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
>[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Joan Wang
>Sent: May-13-13 1:21 PM
>To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
>Subject: [RDA
Thanks a lot. Arthur.
Joan
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Arthur Liu wrote:
> Hi Joan,
>
> That's my understanding, yes. (I'm a recently finished MLS student, so
> take this with a grain of salt.)
>
> Also, note that the associated LC-PCC PS for 9.19.1.3 says to add the
> dates to all new a
e authorized access point for the movie.
>
>
> Thomas Brenndorfer
> Guelph Public Library
>
>
>
> >From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Joan Wang
> >Sent: May-13-13 1:21 PM
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer,
> Thomas
> Sent: May-13-13 2:01 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] author
ized access point for the movie.
Thomas Brenndorfer
Guelph Public Library
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Joan Wang
Sent: May-13-13 1:21 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] authorized a
ovie, there may be several people that
>> fall under the element "Other Person, Family or Corporate Body Associated
>> with the Work" but not a single one of them becomes a core element because
>> none of them are used to form the authorized access point for the movie.
>&g
image
>>> work are not core elements.
>>>
>>> In other words, in the case of a movie, there may be several people that
>>> fall under the element "Other Person, Family or Corporate Body Associated
>>> with the Work" but not a single one of t
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] authorized access point for person/family/corporate body
Sorry. The question should be: any examples under this rule for a corporate
body considered to be a creator? I try to understand the rule.
d) Works that result from the collective ac
Arthur cited the LC/PCC PS:
>Also, note that the associated LC-PCC PS for 9.19.1.3 says to add the dates
>to all new authority records even if not needed to distinguish (in other
>words, apply the option).
Very wise. How is the cataloguer to know if another author with the
same name will apper la
Schiff
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 2:19 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] authorized access point for person/family/corporate body
Thomas,
What you said about films is not quite totally correct. Appendix I does have a
relationship designator under creator of work:
filmm
own
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 2:19 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] authorized access point for person/f
15 matches
Mail list logo