Will rdiff-backup save and version ACLs? I'm hoping to use rsync
--fake-super to preserve ownership and permission info in ACLs and
then create an rdiff-backup repository from the rsynced files.
- Grant
___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at
On 19/07/2013 07:48, Grant wrote:
Will rdiff-backup save and version ACLs? I'm hoping to use rsync
--fake-super to preserve ownership and permission info in ACLs and
then create an rdiff-backup repository from the rsynced files.
Well it is certainly meant to, but I have always used it with
On 7/19/2013 6:12 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 19/07/2013 07:48, Grant wrote:
Will rdiff-backup save and version ACLs? I'm hoping to use rsync
--fake-super to preserve ownership and permission info in ACLs and
then create an rdiff-backup repository from the rsynced files.
Well it is
I was worried more about corruption *on the system being backed up*,
which would not be detected for a long time, and then you have bad bits
and want to find old backups.
___
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
On 18/07/2013 17:39, Grant wrote:
Basically run dump or something on the client, to a holding disk file on
the server with the tape. I don't see any issue with temporary disk
use. The point is that all the temp bits are written anew each time,
not assumed to be the same based on metadata.
So
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com writes:
Basically run dump or something on the client, to a holding disk file on
the server with the tape. I don't see any issue with temporary disk
use. The point is that all the temp bits are written anew each time,
not assumed to be the same based on
Dominic Raferd domi...@timedicer.co.uk writes:
On 19/07/2013 17:12, Greg Troxel wrote:
I was worried more about corruption *on the system being backed up*,
which would not be detected for a long time, and then you have bad bits
and want to find old backups.
I see. As long as the
