Re: 2.2.2-1 on Debian 10

2024-03-27 Thread Dominic Raferd
For Debian/Ubuntu you can use Patrik's repo. Follow instructions at https://nexus.ikus-soft.com/repository/archive/rdiffweb/2.8.9/doc/installation.html#option-1-debian-ubuntu-repository to add the Debian/Ubuntu repository. You can then add Rdiffweb as suggested but you can also add

Re: Version mismatches - upgrade on Ubuntu 22.04 from rdiff-backup 2.0.5 to 2.2.2 or 2.2.6

2024-03-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
h 00, Dominic Raferd a écrit : Hi Patrik can you add my email address to your Rdiffweb google group? For technical reasons I can't subscribe myself. Regards Dominic

Re: Encrypt

2024-02-26 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 26/02/2024 00:07, Jonathan Hutchins wrote: Is encryption an option for rdiff-backup? Not in itself, but you can run rdiff-backup on a system with block device encryption such as LUKS + dm-crypt, and at the time of writing this is offered as an option ('encrypt with LUKS') when installing

Re: The Verification Treadmill

2024-02-17 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 17/02/2024 03:14, Robert Nichols wrote: On 2/16/24 08:44, Dominic Raferd wrote: Until then, I am interested in your parallel processing approach. Presumably you start 8 parallel rdiff-backup verify sessions for datetime points -1 to -8 (and then, when they are all complete, -9 to -16, -17

Re: The Verification Treadmill

2024-02-16 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 15/02/2024 20:05, Robert Nichols wrote: On 2/15/24 09:47, Dominic Raferd wrote: ...snip... So the only way to be confident about *all* the data in a repository is to use 'rdiff-backup verify' to verify each and every backup session in each repository; and this includes verifying the current

The Verification Treadmill

2024-02-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
I wondered if those who know the rdiff-backup code from the inside can confirm or correct my understanding about verification of rdiff-backup repositories, which is as follows: 'rdiff-backup verify' verifies the integrity of all files/directories (etc) in a single backup session at the

Re: Version mismatches - upgrade on Ubuntu 22.04 from rdiff-backup 2.0.5 to 2.2.2 or 2.2.6

2024-02-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
-> /opt/rdiff-backup-2.2/rdiff-backup Le jeu. 15 févr. 2024, à 07 h 32, Dominic Raferd a écrit : Thanks Eric and Patrik. Patrik, on a client (running Ubuntu 22.04) I added your repo (for rdiffweb) per the instructions at your website (option 1), but running apt upgrad

Re: Version mismatches - upgrade on Ubuntu 22.04 from rdiff-backup 2.0.5 to 2.2.2 or 2.2.6

2024-02-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
. Hope this helps, Eric On February 14, 2024 3:32:38 PM UTC, Dominic Raferd < domi...@timedicer.co.uk> wrote: First, continued thanks for Eric and the team for their great work on updating rdiff-backup - really amazing stuff. Following a system upgrade of my backup server to Ubuntu 23

Version mismatches - upgrade on Ubuntu 22.04 from rdiff-backup 2.0.5 to 2.2.2 or 2.2.6

2024-02-14 Thread Dominic Raferd
First, continued thanks for Eric and the team for their great work on updating rdiff-backup - really amazing stuff. Following a system upgrade of my backup server to Ubuntu 23.10, I have version mismatches: clients have  (Windows and) Ubuntu 22.04 (rdiff-backup 2.0.5) whereas the server has

Re: cross-platform backup tool Same files from different source dir causes spurious diff files

2022-02-14 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 15/02/2022 02:24, Mr. Clif wrote: Hi Folks, In case it's helpful, here's a shell function I came up with to backup snapshots of VMs in a way that preserves the usual UIDs and GIDs: ... This is clever but I was puzzled why you experience this UID/GID shift problem in the first place - I

Re: cross-platform backup tool Same files from different source dir causes spurious diff files

2022-02-10 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 10/02/2022 07:19, Mr. Clif wrote: ...Right now my backups for this vm have been corrupted by the shifted UID/GIDs I can no longer use that archive to restore to the running vm... If you want to regress your archive back to a 'clean' state you can try my rdiff-backup-regress script

Re: cross-platform backup tool Unexpectedly Slow on Initial Backup

2022-02-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 08/02/2022 06:59, ewl+rdiffbac...@lavar.de wrote: Hi, just because I became curious, the numbers are probably not to be compared: - iperf3 tells me ~170Mbit/s - I transferred initially my Downloads repository from laptop to server (which has roughly as much disk as you have RAM :-P),

Re: Long-time rdiff-backup user confused on new installation: permissions

2021-11-07 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 06/11/2021 18:45, Bill Harris wrote: I've been using rdiff-backup for 10+ years... What is the problem?

Re: Trouble running rdiff-backup after Windows updates

2021-11-01 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 01/11/2021 15:21, Michael Crider - HOEC wrote: We have used rdiff-backup for well over 10 years for our Linux servers and workstations, and until recently to back up Windows servers and workstations we mounted their drives locally on the backup server and ran rdiff-backup against the mount.

Re: Fresh snapshot

2021-10-16 Thread Dominic Raferd
You could try using rdiff-backup --no-compression (or --no-compression-regexp). This will make backups bigger but should speed up backups and restores. The only built-in compression offered by rdiff-backup is gzip, but if you run rdiff-backup --no-compression to a file system using

Re: change timestamps of backups?

2021-04-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 22/04/2021 08:31, griffin tucker wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 17:17, Dominic Raferd wrote: On 22/04/2021 08:07, Dominic Raferd wrote: On 22/04/2021 08:01, griffin tucker wrote: I've tried using deduplication, but only get about 6gb savings per 30gb. I intend on using squashfs on top

Re: change timestamps of backups?

2021-04-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 22/04/2021 08:07, Dominic Raferd wrote: On 22/04/2021 08:01, griffin tucker wrote: I've tried using deduplication, but only get about 6gb savings per 30gb. I intend on using squashfs on top of rdiff-backup, btrfs is just being used temporarily. On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 16:41, Dominic

Re: change timestamps of backups?

2021-04-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 22/04/2021 08:01, griffin tucker wrote: I've tried using deduplication, but only get about 6gb savings per 30gb. I intend on using squashfs on top of rdiff-backup, btrfs is just being used temporarily. On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 16:41, Dominic Raferd wrote: On 22/04/2021 07:03, griffin tucker

Re: change timestamps of backups?

2021-04-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 22/04/2021 07:03, griffin tucker wrote: i have a collection of the last 5 monthly dumps of various wikis from dumps.wikimedia.org each dump has numbered directories in the format 20210501, 20210401, 20210301, etc. all the filenames in these directories remain the same with each wiki's dump,

Re: Why are you using rdiff-backup?

2021-03-28 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 26/03/2021 12:44, Reio Remma wrote: On 26.03.2021 14:41, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: I would like to add:   * Multi-platform (I have used it on Windows, Linux, FreeBSD)   * Easy to deploy and schedule, because all parameters are given on     the command line   * Command-line interfaces allows

Re: File Formats

2021-03-27 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 27/03/2021 07:29, reg.rdiff_bac...@excel4x.com wrote: On 25.03.2021 09:29, reg.rdiff_bac...@excel4x.com wrote: I just heard about rdiff-backup and I'm planning how to configure it. The documentation says: "Earlier states of your files are saved just by 1) keeping a copy of them, 2) in

Re: Initial Backup Archive

2021-03-27 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 25/03/2021 07:29, reg.rdiff_bac...@excel4x.com wrote: I plan to use rdiff-backup on Windows using Windows networking - e.g. drive letter for remote file access. I have a mirrored copy of files already on the backup system. 1) Can I run rdiff-backup for the first time with a pre-populated

Re: Feedback required - new arguments parsing for rdiff-backup

2021-01-05 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 02/01/2021 20:38, Eric L. Zolf wrote: Hello everybody, first, let me wish you a happy new year, health and good luck. I'm currently working on using argparse to improve the way command line arguments are parsed, in a way compatible with the old handling while developing a new, hopefully

Debian/Ubuntu official release push from 2.0.0

2020-08-17 Thread Dominic Raferd
Can someone help with getting the latest stable release of rdiff-backup i.e. 2.0.5 into the official repositories of Debian/Ubuntu (instead of 2.0.0)? (Otto has Ubuntu launchpad repos which allow 2.0.5 to be installed on old systems, and allow the latest development version to be installed on

Re: rdiff-backup to 2.0.3 on bullseye (ubuntu 20.04)

2020-06-28 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 17:20, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > Hello! > > ke 24. kesäk. 2020 klo 16.14 Dominic Raferd (domi...@timedicer.co.uk) > kirjoitti: > > > > Hi Otto, > > > > Thanks for your great work on rdiff-backup and for your PPAs! > > > &g

Re: Discussion about file format for the future

2020-06-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 15:28, Derek Atkins wrote: > > EricZolf writes: > > > 3. to answer Derek's e-mail as well: would it have an impact on speed? > > To be honest, no clue, we would need to analyze this. > > Just as another data point, apparently a year ago my backup server > wasn't backing

Re: Discussion about file format for the future

2020-06-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 11:46, EricZolf wrote: > > rdiff-backup has currently its own file formats, which are far from > being standard, meaning a lot of custom code to handle these formats, > respectively a lot of different files... +1 for YAML, but please retain compatibility (at least for

Re: Doubled dates in old repositories

2020-04-21 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 07:17, Eric Lavarde wrote: > > > On 20/04/2020 22:54, Gregor Zattler wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > * "Eric L. Zolf" [2020-04-20; 07:43]: > >> How to detect (under Linux): run `cd MY_BACKUP_REPO; ls -1 > >> rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.* | sed -e 's/^.*mirror_metadata\.//'

Re: Doubled dates in old repositories

2020-04-20 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 19:10, Eric L. Zolf wrote: > Hi Dominic, > > On 20/04/2020 08:40, Dominic Raferd wrote: > > I have checked our 108 repositories which go back a long way (I am still > > using v1.2.8). I find this issue in one repository for some 27 dates > > (mos

Re: Doubled dates in old repositories

2020-04-20 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 06:46, Eric L. Zolf wrote: > we've got a report for an issue [322] where we're not sure how it > happened and if it happens often. As I know that some of you have many > and long standing repos, you might want to have a look before you > upgrade to 2.0.0. Also I'd like to

Re: [Errno 28] No space left on device

2019-11-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 19:12, wrote: > Hi, > > On 14/11/2019 01:47, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > >> 3. which file system type you are using to backup? > > Backing-up from NTFS (Windows 7) to ext4. > > Cross-filesystem-types backup is always a bit tricky. This said if you > have the occasion, it

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] --check-destination-dir taking a very long time

2019-09-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
Is it possible you are running out of temporary file space? You can specify a different tmp location with switch --tempdir (or, if running to remote server, --remote-tempdir). When checking an archive rdiff-backup may need a lot of temporary space for all that unpacking. By the way, it may not be

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Future of rdiff-backup: Python 3 migration and project maintainership in general

2019-07-26 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, 17:37 Otto Kekäläinen, wrote: > Hello! > > There has not been any new releases of rdiff-backup since 2009. If the > original maintainer does not intend to work on this project, could I > please be allowed to take over? > > I am a Debian Developer and active in multiple open

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup result is missing text files but no errors, sourcedir to big >2TB

2019-07-20 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 20:43, Jelle de Jong wrote: > On 7/18/19 4:45 PM, Lew Wolfgang wrote: > > On 07/17/2019 04:48 AM, Jelle de Jong wrote: > >> Hello everybody, > >> > >> I am trying to run an rdiff-backup and it keeps missing some documents > >> compared with the source, we are using a

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Exception 'Ace type 9 is not supported yet'

2019-05-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
e to create a new backup set, so I won't know if this > workaround helps immediately. > > Would anyone be able to shed light on this issue? Is there a way to make a > failure to copy (this kind of) ACE non-fatal? > I advise running rdiff-backup from Windows with --no-acls, and following any restore consider using icacls to fix permissions back to the standard inherited ones e.g. icacls %APPDATA%\Thunderbird /reset /t /c /q Dominic Raferd https://www.timedicer.co.uk ___ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Strange "No space left on device"

2019-04-27 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 10:28, David Croll wrote: > > Dear rdiff-backup people, > > > Yesterday, a backup failed repeatedly. Error Number 28 - No space left > on device. The backup stopped with a specific file, a Firefox cache file > with a size of 0 bytes. > > But neither on the source nor on

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Win 2019 to linux doesn't work

2019-03-29 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 11:57, Harald Hannelius wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Dominic Raferd wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 11:47, Harald Hannelius < > harald.hannel...@arcada.fi> > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Dominic Raferd wrote: > >>>

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Win 2019 to linux doesn't work

2019-03-29 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 11:47, Harald Hannelius wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Dominic Raferd wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 11:01, Harald Hannelius < > harald.hannel...@arcada.fi> > > wrote: > > > >> If I run the command "ssh -C root@backupser

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Win 2019 to linux doesn't work

2019-03-29 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 11:01, Harald Hannelius wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a win 2019 server that I'd like to take backups from. I'm using the > OpenSSH version included in MS RSAT and I have succesfully created > SSH-keys > and I can verify that running the ssh-command indeed starts a

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Trouble with interrupted rdiff-backup

2018-12-24 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 at 11:20, dsep...@t-online.de wrote: > Today morning i started a backup. This backup gots interrupted by the feet > of our cat :) > > So i thought, that i simply empty the target directory and start over from > scratch. But no luck. Everything i try gets answered from

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Forgetting to run as root: how to recover quickly

2018-08-01 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 17:31, Bill Harris wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:30 AM Dominic Raferd > wrote: > >> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 16:53, Bill Harris wrote: >> >> > I've used rdiff-backup for years, and I'm mostly very happy with it. >> There >> &

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Forgetting to run as root: how to recover quickly

2018-07-31 Thread Dominic Raferd
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 16:53, Bill Harris wrote: > I've used rdiff-backup for years, and I'm mostly very happy with it. There > is one problem that crops up occasionally; and I haven't found a way around > it yet. > > AFAICT, rdiff-backup likes running as root. On rare occasion, I forget and >

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] backups failing

2018-02-05 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 5 February 2018 at 10:59, Richard Hector wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a problem with an (inherited) rdiff-backup setup - actually used > from backupninja. > > When I try to run a backup, I get: > > OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: >

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Still maintained?

2018-02-05 Thread Dominic Raferd
I am still reading the list and actively using rdiff-backup, which works well. However it seems to be effectively unmaintained and has been for some time. I don't do python sadly. It would be great if someone such as Patrik could take it on (as he has done so well for rdiffweb, which provides a

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup-regress script query - need to be 'nobody' or 'root'

2017-06-23 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 23 June 2017 at 12:53, Ron Leach wrote: > List, good morning, > > Having messed up the latest backup increment of our quite-large filesystem > and, having long been a very happy user of Dominic's rdiff-backup-regress > script, I thought I'd better regress the messed-up

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Remove (large) files from backup without generating negative diff

2017-06-11 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 11 June 2017 at 11:13, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I have a long established backup with some large files which I would > like to move to another directory withing the same backup (or just > remove entirely from the backup) as a clean up of the original disk >

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] "Found too many current_mirror incs!"

2017-05-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 4 May 2017 at 09:44, Ron Leach wrote: > > > Thanks, I've done that and I think there must be, after all that, a > somewhat more-serious problem. The regress started then aborted saying > > Error 1 occurred when attempting to regress archive... > ls: cannot access

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] "Found too many current_mirror incs!"

2017-05-03 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 3 May 2017 at 22:28, Ron Leach <ronle...@tesco.net> wrote: > On 02/05/2017 23:42, Dominic Raferd wrote: > > >> I suggest you take a backup of the existing broken repository and then try >> on it the latest version of my script which can be obtained from >> ht

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] "Found too many current_mirror incs!"

2017-05-03 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 3 May 2017 at 08:37, Ron Leach <ronle...@tesco.net> wrote: > On 02/05/2017 23:42, Dominic Raferd wrote: > >> >> >> I suggest you take a backup of the existing broken repository and then try >> on it the latest version of my script >> > > Domini

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] "Found too many current_mirror incs!"

2017-05-02 Thread Dominic Raferd
> > ​...​ > > I searched for this new error and, in this archive, > > http://www.backupcentral.com/forum/17/213517 > > Dominic announces what I imagine is an early version of his regress script > which overcomes this second error. > > But I am unsure whether to run it here because - really - I

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Backup fails with "lost connection to the remote"

2017-03-23 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 23 March 2017 at 07:55, Henti Smith wrote: > Good day all. > > I'm having a tough problem with backing up a server. We've been running > successful backups on the server, but due to storage constraints we dropped > the retention to just one day. We're using backupninja

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Backup multiple disks (on Windows)

2017-01-14 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 13 January 2017 at 18:36, Patrik Dufresne wrote: > Hello, > > If I need to backup multiple disks (C: & D:) on a Windows server, do I need > to run rdiff-backup twice. Once for each disk ? Or there is a way to backup > both of them in a single pass ? > Hi Patrik, if you are

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] [bug] Excluding hidden files the wrong way doesn't result in an error

2017-01-05 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 4 January 2017 at 22:40, Ilario wrote: > 2017-01-04 20:11 GMT+01:00 Adrian Klaver : >> On 01/04/2017 11:00 AM, Ilario wrote: >>> Excluding a hidden file without full path doesn't rise an error (as >>> happens with non hidden files) and copies

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] [bug] AssertionError: Bad index order

2017-01-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 4 January 2017 at 16:08, Ilario wrote: > 2017-01-04 15:53 GMT+01:00 Ilario : >> 2017-01-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Ilario : >>> AssertionError: Bad index order: ('long_filename_data', '820') >= >>> ('backup-20140716', 'progetti',

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] --restore-as-of error

2016-07-12 Thread Dominic Raferd
If this doesn't work, try with --remote-tempdir [path] instead of/as well as --tempdir [path], as you seem to be restoring from a remote machine and in this case I think the remote machine probably does the heavy lifting. On 12 July 2016 at 07:29, Dominic Raferd <domi...@timedicer.co.uk>

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] --restore-as-of error

2016-07-12 Thread Dominic Raferd
Put the --tempdir (path) before the main parameters. On 12 Jul 2016 07:24, "Stephen Butler" wrote: > Hi all, > > > I'm experimenting with restoring older version of a large outlook file > (9gb) > > > My command and the error output. > > sudo rdiff-backup

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup performance -- slow operation on initial backup?

2016-03-30 Thread Dominic Raferd
gt; Thank you for taking the time to look at this.. > > > > On Mon, March 28, 2016 10:41 am, Dominic Raferd wrote: > >> Is this really your first rdiff-backup to this location? If you have any > >> previous rdiff-backup runs to this repository then the situation

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup performance -- slow operation on initial backup?

2016-03-28 Thread Dominic Raferd
Is this really your first rdiff-backup to this location? If you have any previous rdiff-backup runs to this repository then the situation is complicated by rdiff-backup's need to create a new set of reverse diff files to be able to regress to previous file contents. What is your /tmp location?

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] How to cope with missing 'rdiff-backup-data' in destination directory

2016-02-18 Thread Dominic Raferd
Hello rdiez, I have done a simple test of this scenario but when I run rdiff-backup --verify I don't see any warning messages. (I believe the SHA1 digests are held in the rdiff-backup-data/mirror_metadata.* files.) See some postings here

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Sol1 taking over rdiff-backup

2016-02-12 Thread Dominic Raferd
Great news, thank you for taking on this responsibility. Dominic On 13 February 2016 at 05:28, Dave Kempe wrote: > Gday, > as of today, Sol1 has taken over official maintainership of rdiff-backup. > We have done so with the blessing of the original author, Ben Escoto, and >

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] How to cope with missing 'rdiff-backup-data' in destination directory

2016-01-21 Thread Dominic Raferd
The message I see in the same situation is: Fatal Error: Destination directory [dir] exists, but does not look like a rdiff-backup directory. Running rdiff-backup like this could mess up what is currently in it. *If youwant to update or overwrite it, run rdiff-backup with the --forceoption*.

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] python3 support

2016-01-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
Hello Patrik I believe the current maintainer is Ned Harvey who took over in May 2013, but I think his actions were confined to some fixes to the website rather than any work on the program code, and he hasn't been visible here recently. Before him the maintainer was Andrew Ferguson and before

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Exception 'Path: C:/.ssh, just after start of rdiff

2015-12-10 Thread Dominic Raferd
I am not a python coder sadly, but the fault appears to be generated by this line in fs_abilities.py: assert letter_rp.lstat(), letter_rp I would suggest commenting out this line, as it is just an error test, and in this case it may be a 'false positive', but of course this is not so easy for

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Repair repository

2015-09-23 Thread Dominic Raferd
to restore 2015-08-21T01:12:31-04:00, we need to delete every newer file from increments directory. Then --check-destination-dir is working. -- Patrik Dufresne On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Dominic Raferd <domi...@timedicer.co.uk <mailto:domi...@timedicer.co.uk>> wrote: H

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Repair repository

2015-09-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
Hi Patrik On 22/09/2015 22:00, Patrik Dufresne wrote: I've tried the script. I had issues with it. It searchs 'current_mirror' file recursively. For some reash, the backup contains files named 'current_mirror'. I add `-maxdepth 1` to fix this. Good point, I have updated the script with

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Repair repository

2015-09-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
After deleting the current_mirror file did you then run rdiff-backup with --check-destination-dir? This performs the actual regression to the previous, hopefully consistent, backup. On 15 September 2015 at 00:46, Patrik Dufresne wrote: > Hello, > > One of my backup repository

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Repair repository

2015-09-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
;2015-09-14T19:00:02-04:00". Should I delete all of > them ? I know the last successfule backup is "2015-08-24". > > -- > Patrik Dufresne > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Dominic Raferd <domi...@timedicer.co.uk> > wrote: > >> After de

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Non recoverable error "raised of class '':"

2015-09-05 Thread Dominic Raferd
Hi Heri On 05/09/2015 15:52, heri wrote: Hi The following error concerns a file in a folder which is maintained by rdiff-backup itself. I never changed something therein. rdiff-backup cannot recover itself. Each run of rdiff-backup" --include-globbing-filelist rdiff_include_f_to_r.txt

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] backup Windows to Linux file permissions

2015-08-21 Thread Dominic Raferd
Hello Patrik I think the simple solution is to backup to a directory to which only one linux user has access. For our windows backups each Windows client machine has a separate linux user account on the server and backs up to its home directory. All users' home directories have 0700

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] State of the rdiff-backup project

2015-08-14 Thread Dominic Raferd
My 2p... Rdiff-backup has limitations and it would be *really* good if someone who understood python could step up and maintain the code, but I don't see the problem with regressions. Yes they are slow but they should be emergency operations reserved for rare circumstances. If you are

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Exception '[Errno 28] No space left on device'

2015-07-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
I get: Inode count: 29360128 Inodes per group: 8192 Inode blocks per group: 512 Inode size: 256 so I don't think what you are seeing is excessive. To use --remote-tempdir you specify the directory as it would be on the remote machine (and it should exist

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Exception '[Errno 28] No space left on device'

2015-07-21 Thread Dominic Raferd
Use --remote-tempdir switch to set the temp dir to be used on the remote machine. On 21/07/2015 03:15, Stephen Butler wrote: Thanks Bob, That sounds like a good lead, The server is running tinycore and /tmp is in memory. I've created following folder on server /mnt/hda1/tmp I've set it to

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] backup keeps failing

2015-02-05 Thread Dominic Raferd
I don't think temporary space is likely to be an issue on the destination machine when doing a backup run. But if you want to rule out the out-of-temp issue at the destination when running rdiff-backup remotely, you need to use the --remote-tempdir switch, not --tempdir. Removing the

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Script to delete unwanted files from your repository

2015-01-17 Thread Dominic Raferd
Thanks for sharing this Clif, it seems a most ingenious and useful tool. I would still recommend that wherever practicable people regress an archive to recover disk space (my rdiff-backup-regress utility can help with this), but if this is not feasible, your script could be a life-saver.

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Remove the latest accidentally created backup

2014-12-28 Thread Dominic Raferd
Marcin: Please look at my utility rdiff-backup-regress at http://www.timedicer.co.uk/programs/help/rdiff-backup-regress.sh.php In your case I think you need to run it with -n 2. Regards, Dominic http://www.timedicer.co.uk/ On 28/12/2014 19:31, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: Hi, I accidentally

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Deleteing Files from repository

2014-12-21 Thread Dominic Raferd
Hello Stephen Of course you do realise (now!) that you must never delete stuff from an active repository by using rm... Assuming you still have, somewhere else, the directory that you deleted from your repository, I would suggest that you copy this back into the repository, then run

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] --exclude problems

2014-10-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
Your problem I think is that bash expands the asterisks, you could try this (note the single quotes): rdiffoptions='-v4 --print-statistics --exclude **Outlook.pst'; or try escaping the asterisks with backslashes... To properly overcome Outlook.pst being locked, as you have found you need to

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Web GUI

2014-10-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
rdiffWeb is maybe 'stale' but it still works fine. If you have problems installing it, try my helper program: http://www.timedicer.co.uk/programs/help/rdiffweb-install.sh.php Dominic On 09/10/2014 14:03, m...@dkriesel.com wrote: Am 09.10.2014 15:00, schrieb Dale E. Qualls: Is anyone using

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Web GUI

2014-10-09 Thread Dominic Raferd
wiki link in help regards Stefan Am Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2014, 15:28:49 schrieb Dominic Raferd: rdiffWeb is maybe 'stale' but it still works fine. If you have problems installing it, try my helper program: http://www.timedicer.co.uk/programs/help/rdiffweb-install.sh.php Dominic On 09/10

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] --exclude problems

2014-10-08 Thread Dominic Raferd
Stephen: As you seem to be running this under Windows, please try: --exclude **.pst Dominic On 08/10/2014 07:09, Stephen Butler wrote: Hi all, Having trouble excluding Outlook.pst file from a backup. Target dir is d:/Users/Steve And the outlook.pst file is located several sub folders below

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Incremental restoration

2014-09-17 Thread Dominic Raferd
I can't see how to do what you want except the slow way, but I also don't understand what you are trying to achieve, or why you want to restore past increments. As far as I can see attic (if that is your preferred choice) doesn't keep prior versions of backed-up files (or deleted files). I

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] adding --resume back

2014-09-05 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 04/09/2014 15:39, Dominic Raferd wrote: I like that idea. But whereas the initial snapshot takes up almost no disk space, I think that deleting its rdiff-backup-data directory would cause it to swell in size by the size of the rdiff-backup-data directory, or perhaps somewhat more (since

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] adding --resume back

2014-09-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
Hello Marco If you want to do some coding work on rdiff-backup then that would be welcome, but I think you will be on your own. rdiff-backup is not under active development at present, sadly. An alternative is to see if you can prevent the problem of a broken

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] adding --resume back

2014-09-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 04/09/2014 13:01, Marco Mariani wrote: Even if it does, it isn't much use if your communication drops are so frequent that you rarely complete a single backup session, because your last usable backup data might be too old for your purpose. Not only at the level of backup sessions, I must

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] adding --resume back

2014-09-04 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 04/09/2014 15:02, Chris Wilson wrote: Hi all, On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Dominic Raferd wrote: If I had enough space for the LVM snapshot, I would probably rsync the current data and run rdiff-backup locally on the destination every time rsync succeeds. This would provide - in our setup

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] solid backup

2014-07-28 Thread Dominic Raferd
You could also consider duplicity http://duplicity.nongnu.org/ which creates encrypted tar-format volumes, but it is a different tool to rdiff-backup. On 25/07/2014 23:10, Egor M. wrote: No problem. Can't recommend anything here though as I don't

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Possible to merge backups of the same source on multiple destinations?

2014-06-30 Thread Dominic Raferd
Steve, I'm not clear if the backups to which you are referring are rdiff-backup archives or just straightforward copies of the source data. If the former then you could just run rdiff-backup from each backup location in turn (starting with the oldest) to a single new

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Help - rdiff-backup removing permision on target folder

2014-05-24 Thread Dominic Raferd
Can you give us a bit more informationj? What is the full rdiff-backup line that apparently causes the problem? What linux os are you running on the server? On 24/05/2014 05:57, bt101 wrote: I'm been stumped by a problem for days. I use nothing but linux and have been using rdiff-backup for

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Gentoo masking rdiff-backup

2014-05-19 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 14/04/2014 11:50, Patrick Lauer wrote: On 04/14/2014 04:41 PM, Tobias Leupold wrote: Hello list! Gentoo Linux has masked rdiff-backup: Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org (09 Apr 2014) Dead upstream, has known dataloss bugs. Please use

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Files Missing In Backup Resulting in Update Error

2014-05-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
this patch and running a backup at this very moment. Unfortunately it’s taking quite long because I had to interrupt a previous backup and rdiff is busy with ‘regressing’. Regards, Marijn On 14 May 2014, at 14:07, Dominic Raferd domi

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Files Missing In Backup Resulting in Update Error

2014-05-15 Thread Dominic Raferd
. attributes / access is not really essential, but preferred!  Thanks, Marijn On 15 May 2014, at 10:45, Dominic Raferd domi...@timedicer.co.uk wrote: Hello Marijn

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Files Missing In Backup Resulting in Update Error

2014-05-14 Thread Dominic Raferd
Marijn, a similar situation was discussed here quite recently, see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2014-03/msg00012.html. The cause in this case, and probably in yours, is that the source data is changing while the backup is proceeding. I note that in

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] excluding .git, .svn, c from rdiff-backup

2014-04-25 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 25/04/2014 03:48, Brice Burgess wrote: I have a relatively simple rdiff backup script which backs up the `/home` directory to `/backups/test-target`. |=== #!/bin/sh rdiff-backup \ --exclude '**/.git' \ --exclude '**/.svn' \ --exclude '**/.ssh' \

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Warning: Attempt to rename over same inode

2014-04-02 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 29/03/2014 12:40, Marcus Schopen wrote: Hi, I got these warnings today, when running an rdiff-backup on some of my cyrus mailboxes. I did a lvm snap before running backup: Warning: Attempt to rename over same inode:

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Safe to remove old increments while a backup runs?

2014-03-26 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 26/03/2014 09:41, Thomas Harold wrote: On 3/26/2014 4:59 AM, Sam's Lists wrote: I was removing some old increments on my backup server using: rdiff-backup --remove-older-than 3M --force root While this was running a cronjob on a remote

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] ignore file access error

2014-03-14 Thread Dominic Raferd
Martin: See the response on this issue at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2004-06/msg00071.html by Ben Escoto who wrote the original rdiff-backup: The error is probably caused by files changing as rdiff-backup processes them. If this happens, rdiff-backup doesn't touch

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] remove a single backup from increments

2014-03-08 Thread Dominic Raferd
Marcus, because rdiff-backup works with reverse diffs you can normally only delete the oldest increments. rdiff-backup --remove-older-than 5B... should remove the 5th most-recent increment i.e. the oldest of yours below. You could try: rdiff-backup

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Fatal Error: Bad directory

2014-01-29 Thread Dominic Raferd
Possibilities: 1. Does the backup which causes the problem come from a source which already has a subdirectory called 'rdiff-backup-data'? This is a special-purpose directory for rdiff-backup so there might be problems if it already exists on the source. 2. Are both backup destination

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Recurring error on RH

2014-01-22 Thread Dominic Raferd
Laurent, Firstly - thanks for posting, I see you are using a version of my regression script and I have been able to update it slightly based on your posting. However this is nothing to do with your main problem, regarding which the rdiff-backup FAQ here says:

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Delete most recent increment?

2013-12-18 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 18/12/2013 15:43, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 12/18/2013 03:29 AM, Ron Leach wrote: On 16/12/2013 15:28, Dominic Raferd wrote: Ron, see my utility here: http://www.timedicer.co.uk/programs/help/rdiff-backup-regress.sh.php Dominic, thank you for posting this. From its description, it would

  1   2   3   >