Dean,
dean gaudet-2 wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Keith Edmunds wrote:
[...]
but this shouldn't stop anyone else from contributing patches.
[...]
You're right that this shouldn't stop anyone else from contributing patches
but the problem is that without a maintainer none of these patches
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Yeroc wrote:
dean gaudet-2 wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Keith Edmunds wrote:
[...]
but this shouldn't stop anyone else from contributing patches.
[...]
You're right that this shouldn't stop anyone else from contributing patches
but the problem is that without
Kevin Horton wrote:
If Ben lacks the time and/or interest to maintain rdiff-backup, is
there anyone who is interested and capable of taking over? If so, he
could inquire if Ben is willing to hand over control. If Ben doesn't
want to hand over control, then the new maintainer could fork a new
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Keith Edmunds wrote:
Ben, are you still reading this? Dean?
i'm here...
rdiff-backup just hasn't been at the top of my list for a while. mostly
because i have a setup which works and there's a zillion other things with
higher priority right now.
i'm still using
Jesper...On 10/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 10/26/06, Yeroc -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can any of the current maintainer(s) allay my concerns or has rdiff-backup been abandoned?Hi Corey.While not being a maintainer myself I can say that I use rdiff-backup
to backup 3 OSX machines
Roland,I guess this confirms my fears as there have been no replies from any of the developers. Unless the original developers take an interest in it again or someone else takes up the torch it's probably not a good idea to use it. This is a real shame because so far it looked like the most
On 10/31/2006 3:56:42 PM +
Corey Puffalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I guess this confirms my fears as there have been no replies from any of
the developers.
You raise a good point. In essence, there is only one developer (Ben)
and he has been quiet of late. There are a couple of other people
