Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Feature requests questions/discussion

2005-11-03 Thread Fran Firman
I think the hashing of the files is worth the overhead. At work we currently keep 3 months of backups on our backup server ~ 1.4TBytes of data. I would like the hash values to be available for reporting against, so that I can also do the equ of tripwire on the servers. ie these files changed,

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Feature requests questions/discussion

2005-11-03 Thread dean gaudet
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Fran Firman wrote: At the moment I find a lot of false positives. ie a file is backed up when it has not changed at all. When I was first reading about rdiff-backup, and that it used rsync-lib, it seemed to be a side affect of the rsync library. It had to do with the

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Feature requests questions/discussion

2005-10-25 Thread Ben Escoto
Wiebe Cazemier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:48:47 +0200 First, I would really like an option like --store-checksums so that rdiff-backup calculates md5 hashes when doing a backup, and that that checksum it used for integrity checks upon restoration. But at

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Feature requests questions/discussion

2005-10-25 Thread Wiebe Cazemier
Ben Escoto wrote: It's a good idea, and one that someone else has suggested before. The checksums would be stored in the mirror-metadata file. I don't even think it would be hard to implement. Do you think it's possible to combine it with the copy syscall/API-call rdiff-backup probably

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Feature requests questions/discussion

2005-10-25 Thread dean gaudet
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Ben Escoto wrote: It's a good idea, and one that someone else has suggested before. The checksums would be stored in the mirror-metadata file. I don't even think it would be hard to implement. And there could be a --verify switch to go through the repository and make