Charles Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote the following on Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:05:57 -0600
Do you think it would make sense to define behaviour for when both
remove-more-than and remove-older-than are used? It otherwise would be
ambiguous as to whether such indicates one wishes to remove
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, sim wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Peter Schuller wrote:
Often I would find it very useful to be able to say keep the N newest
snapshots and remove the rest, which is safer.
Peter,
This feature already exists in rdiff-backup. From the 'Time Formats'
section of the man
Hello,
Peter,
This feature already exists in rdiff-backup. From the 'Time Formats'
section of the man page:
6. A backup session specification which is a non-negative integer
followed by 'B'. For
instance, '0B' specifies the time of the current mirror, and '3B'
specifies the
Peter Schuller wrote:
Hello,
I am always reluctant to use --remove-older-than in scripts because
there is always the possibility that the clock is screwed up for
whatever reason and it decides to remove all reverse diffs. Often I
would find it very useful to be able to say keep the N newest
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Peter Schuller wrote:
Often I would find it very useful to be able to say keep the N newest
snapshots and remove the rest, which is safer.
Peter,
This feature already exists in rdiff-backup. From the 'Time Formats'
section of the man page:
6. A backup session
