Re: [Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake version survey

2016-11-11 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:59 PM, David Hall wrote: > The EPEL repo has cmake3 package (3.6). Can that not be a dependency for > rdkit in epel? Yep, I overlooked that one. So a newer cmake requirement is not an issue -- De

Re: [Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake version survey

2016-11-09 Thread David Hall
tos and rhel. > > > _ > From: Gianluca Sforna > Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 12:36 PM > Subject: Re: [Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake version survey > To: Greg Landrum > Cc: RDKit Developers List > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:41

Re: [Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake version survey

2016-11-09 Thread Greg Landrum
Well, that answers at least part of the question. I certainly am interested in having you able to do the builds for centos and rhel. _ From: Gianluca Sforna Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 12:36 PM Subject: Re: [Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake

Re: [Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake version survey

2016-11-09 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Greg Landrum wrote: > This decision shouldn't matter to most users since they will be getting > pre-built binaries either via their OS's package manager or conda. If you want to make it easy on people with RHEL/CentOS 7, they have in the repos cmake 2.8 and boost

[Rdkit-devel] Boost and cmake version survey

2016-11-09 Thread Greg Landrum
The move to modern C++ is coming (at last!) and when we make it, I would like to go ahead and specify (relatively) modern minimum versions of boost and/or cmake. This is your chance to pipe up on what we do here. In case you have no idea what I'm talking about here, the relevant blog post is: https