We were asked to inspect a GT system installed by others. Service is 208 3ph
with two (?) Fronius IG 4500 208v inverters. The inverter panel is 3ph with two
2pole breakers - one each side of the buss bar in a A/B, B/C configuration
(??). Called Fronius and they said it would work, but they
Hi Holt,
We installed a commercial system a year ago for the National Park
Service that was designed by a competitor (?) and signed off on by an
engineer. It consisted of 13.2 kw of pv and two Fronius 7000 watt, 208
3 ph. inverters. It sounds a lot like what you are dealing with. I
questioned
Hi holt,
Just FYI, Fronius will pay you $250 each to swap the inverters.
Larry Crutcher
Starlight Solar Power Systems
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:59 PM, hol...@sbcglobal.net hol...@sbcglobal.net
wrote:
We were asked to inspect a GT system installed by others. Service is 208 3ph
with two (?)
I would agree that the imbalance at these power levels is not a major
issue. If it appears that Phase A is most heavily-loaded, I'd install
the inverters as A-B and A-C to help mitigate the existing imbalance. If
you've got a lot of 1P loads on a 3P service-- lighting, office
receptacles or
I really don't understand what your problem with this arrangement is.
How would this be different from a house on phase A-B installing an
inverter and the next house on Phase B-C installing an inverter? Or,
installing two single phase 240V A/C units in a three phase building?
Electricians have no
Bill Brooks posted this in 2008. A couple of project-specific sentences
were removed to avoid confusion.
The 6kVA value comes from the California Rule 21 that I worked on. It only
applies to split-phase 240V systems (6kVA on 120V). There is no specific
limit for imbalance on a 3-phase service.
6 matches
Mail list logo