t: Thursday, June 04, 2009 6:29 PM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: 690.47D (revisited)
Kelly,
If I understand your situation, the AHJ is allowing you to use the existing
grounding electrode/s as the (new for 2008) required array electrode, rather
than adding an
r.com
-Original Message-
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Kelly
Keilwitz, Whidbey Sun & Wind
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 5:34 PM
To: RE Wrenches listserve
Subject: [RE-wrenches] FW: 690.47D (revisited)
Kelly,
If I understand your situation, the AHJ is allowing you to use
the existing grounding electrode/s as the (new for 2008) required
array electrode, rather than adding an additional electrode closer to the
array.
He does want an additional GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR, sized appropriatel
All,
This issue was discussed here about a year ago, before most jurisdictions
had adopted the 2008 Code and AHJ's started interpreting it.
Our current situation is a residential, roof-mounted PV array, with not an
extraordinary distance to the existing AC GEC. The AHJ has NOT required the
"addit
4 matches
Mail list logo
