Re: [RE-wrenches] SMA WebBox - Bluetooth vs RS485

2013-09-03 Thread Dave Click
thanks for the feedback, everybody! On 2013/8/30 21:42, Jesse Dahl wrote: I have two installed so far, 0 issues. One is 5 feet from the inverter one is around 50 feet away. Lots to like! Jesse Sent from my iPhone On Aug 30, 2013, at 6:41 PM, SwingJunkie wrote: Dave, We put one in early t

Re: [RE-wrenches] SMA WebBox - Bluetooth vs RS485

2013-08-31 Thread Chris Mason
I have three in use since about two weeks ago. One webbox has nine Sunny Tripower inverters on it. I love love love them. No cabling and tremendous range. I have had to change the Bluetooth ID to distinct values because the inverters on the next building about 200' away showed up as new devices.

Re: [RE-wrenches] SMA WebBox - Bluetooth vs RS485

2013-08-30 Thread Jesse Dahl
I have two installed so far, 0 issues. One is 5 feet from the inverter one is around 50 feet away. Lots to like! Jesse Sent from my iPhone On Aug 30, 2013, at 6:41 PM, SwingJunkie wrote: > Dave, > > We put one in early this year about 70' from the inverter. No issues so I'm a > fan. Two dia

Re: [RE-wrenches] SMA WebBox - Bluetooth vs RS485

2013-08-30 Thread SwingJunkie
Dave, We put one in early this year about 70' from the inverter. No issues so I'm a fan. Two dials to adjust, one in the inverter, one on the web box, to set the channel. No experience with the Bluetooth sensor box so chime in on results when you know more. Cheers Carl Adams SunRock Solar

[RE-wrenches] SMA WebBox - Bluetooth vs RS485

2013-08-30 Thread Dave Click
Have folks been having good experiences with the SMA Bluetoothed WebBox, or should I stick with the standard 485 edition? I'm guessing it'll be about a 20' max triangle between the SB1TL, WebBox, and SensorBox. Likely using a Sprint modem for the internet connection. Thanks in advance and