re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jamie JohnsonSent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:14 PMTo: RE-wrenchesSubject: Re: [RE-wrenches] feed-in imbalance
Marco,
I believe some of the discussions in the past had to do with t
-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jamie Johnson
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:14 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] feed-in imbalance
Marco,
I believe some of the discussions in the past had to do with the old 6kW
imbalance limit that is used by several utilities
to:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Marco
Mangelsdorf
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 11:01 AM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: [RE-wrenches] feed-in imbalance
Now that SMA has come up with their new 8, 9 and 10 kW transformerless line
of single-phase 120/208V inverter
Marco,
I believe some of the discussions in the past had to do with the old 6kW imbalance limit that is used by several utilities on a 120/240 small residential single phase transformer. (don't remember the CA utility that came up with this)
I had this discussion with our local utility (FPL) rece
Now that SMA has come up with their new 8, 9 and 10 kW transformerless line
of single-phase 120/208V inverters, it brings up the question once again
about how practical and wise it is to have one or two of these inverters
feed into a three-phase service. That is, is such an unbalanced feed much,
i
5 matches
Mail list logo