Re: [Readable-discuss] Reorganize to reduce namespace pollution and maximally create library

2013-12-05 Thread David A. Wheeler
John Cowan dropped the following bad news: > >> Dude, you have a hold of the Tar Baby here. R6RS and R7RS libraries > >> can't be the result of a macro, neither as a whole nor in part. All > >> you've done is trade off one set of portability breakers for another. > > I said: > > Ugh. In that case

Re: [Readable-discuss] treatment of quote symbol

2013-12-05 Thread David A. Wheeler
> David A. Wheeler scripsit: > > What do you think x'x *should* mean? That's incredibly ugly! On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:08:53 -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Its meaning is specifically left up to the implementation. Apostrophe > is neither a (required to be treated as part of the > identifier) nor a

Re: [Readable-discuss] Reorganize to reduce namespace pollution and maximally create library

2013-12-05 Thread Alan Manuel Gloria
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:10 PM, David A. Wheeler wrote: > John Cowan: >> Dude, you have a hold of the Tar Baby here. R6RS and R7RS libraries >> can't be the result of a macro, neither as a whole nor in part. All >> you've done is trade off one set of portability breakers for another. > > Ugh. I

Re: [Readable-discuss] Portability tweaks to kernel.scm (our Scheme implementation)

2013-12-05 Thread Alan Manuel Gloria
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:02 AM, David A. Wheeler wrote: > Alan: This redefines raise/guard for all guiles, even if it's already > available. > It should probably only do that for guile < 1.8, and should otherwise yank in > the real R6RS handler. Do you agree? If so, could you add that magic,

Re: [Readable-discuss] treatment of quote symbol

2013-12-05 Thread John Cowan
David A. Wheeler scripsit: > What do you think x'x *should* mean? That's incredibly ugly! Its meaning is specifically left up to the implementation. Apostrophe is neither a (required to be treated as part of the identifier) nor a (required to be treated as not part of the identifier). Its ge

Re: [Readable-discuss] treatment of quote symbol

2013-12-05 Thread David A. Wheeler
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:14:34 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote: > Hi all, > > it's beginning to annoy me: normal Scheme readers treat quote and > quasiquote symbols as terminating charachters when reading symbols. > > With the "readable reader" they suddenly become part of a symbol. Tha

[Readable-discuss] treatment of quote symbol

2013-12-05 Thread Jörg F. Wittenberger
Hi all, it's beginning to annoy me: normal Scheme readers treat quote and quasiquote symbols as terminating charachters when reading symbols. With the "readable reader" they suddenly become part of a symbol. That's all rather confusing and causes so much incompatibility. Its this really intend