BTW,
It's possible to write code that is interpreted *identically*
on both wisp and sweet when indentation is enabled. In sweet, a "." at the
beginning of a line post-indent is basically ignored. This was for consistency
with neoteric-expressions, and left there in part to be consistent with swe
Version 1.0.6 of the "readable" library has been released.
This is mainly minor improvements for the Common Lisp implementation:
* Bug fix for a subtle rarely-encountered error in the
Common Lisp implementation of the sweet-expression reader.
Previously, the reader would
Hi David,
Am Dienstag, 18. November 2014, 22:28:11 schrieb David A. Wheeler:
> > It comes down to personal preferences: The weight we give to different
> > aesthetic aspects of programming languages. For me, the syntactic
> > simplicity is one of the main selling points of lisp and scheme, and
> >
