Yes, it works. Thank you.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:34 PM, David A. Wheeler
wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:42:35 -0400, Alex Rozenshteyn
> wrote:
>> Huh. I'm surprised that there was actually a problem. Thanks for
>> fixing it! (and sorry for spamming the list a bit)
>
> That's not spam at al
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:42:35 -0400, Alex Rozenshteyn
wrote:
> Huh. I'm surprised that there was actually a problem. Thanks for
> fixing it! (and sorry for spamming the list a bit)
That's not spam at all. This list is *exactly* for discussing issues.
I'm surprised that slipped through, but obvio
Huh. I'm surprised that there was actually a problem. Thanks for
fixing it! (and sorry for spamming the list a bit)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:44 PM, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:44:02 -0400, Alex Rozenshteyn
> wrote:
>> I'm trying to build the 1.0.2 version on a 64-bit debia
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:44:02 -0400, Alex Rozenshteyn
wrote:
> I'm trying to build the 1.0.2 version on a 64-bit debian testing
> machine. I have guile-2.0 (and guile-2.0-dev) installed. After running
> ./configure --without-common-lisp, I try to run make, and I get the
> attached error.
>
> I'm
(Third time's the charm; darn HTML formatted message)
(I tried to send this before, but I hadn't subscribed to the list, so
it was held in queue and didn't get through)
I'm trying to build the 1.0.2 version on a 64-bit debian testing
machine. I have guile-2.0 (and guile-2.0-dev) installed. After
(I tried to send this before, but I hadn't subscribed to the list, so it
was held in queue and didn't get through)
I'm trying to build the 1.0.2 version on a 64-bit debian testing machine. I
have guile-2.0 (and guile-2.0-dev) installed. After running ./configure
--without-common-lisp, I try to run
