I plan to do some file names of some executables & the formatter source; let me know if there are problems or better names:
* I plan to rename "iformat.sscm" into "sweetener.sscm". This program takes standard Lisp and reformats into sweet-expressions. I didn't want to call it a pretty-printer; it just uses "read" so all comments inside datums are lost. Still, with that basic weakness it's turning out to produce fairly clean results! * I plan to create a trivial executable "sweetener", which compiles-if-necessary and runs sweetener. This creates a simple filter to take existing code & see what it looks like with sweet-expressions. * I plan to *rename* "sweet-filter" to "unsweetener". Now that we have programs that can do sweet->traditional and traditional->sweet, that name is not so clear (which one is sweet-filter? they are BOTH filters that involve sweet-expressions!) --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
