The reformatter (from traditional s-expr to sweet-expressions) is starting to
actually work.
I wrote it with sweet-expressions (of course!), so generate its Scheme file
with:
$ make iformat.scm
Now you can process Scheme s-expressions. For example, to see sugar.scm:
$ guile iformat.scm < sugar.scm | less
I cheated by using "object->string" which isn't in R5RS, but is in guile. That
could be replaced later (in a portability layer), but it's a pain to generate
some data types without it.
There's a lot it doesn't do. In particular, there's only one term per line
(terms can have parameters, so {3 + 4} can be on a line), and it doesn't have
any clue about common Lisp function names & how they might be better formatted.
But it's enough to able to see what things look like.
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
