Am 27.11.2013 02:22, schrieb David A. Wheeler:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:11:39 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
I changed it's signature to match srfi-23 (for know)
(: read-error (string &rest * -> *)
Okay, but you'll need to modify the procedure definition to match.
Sure. I just did not wan
I said:
> > The ONLY procedure that throws an exception is "read-error":
> >(define (read-error message)
On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:11:39 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" wrote:
> I changed it's signature to match srfi-23 (for know)
>
> (: read-error (string &rest * -> *)
Okay, but you'll need to m
Am 25.11.2013 15:14, schrieb David A. Wheeler:
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:24:23 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger"
>wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm just making my first experiences in actually using srfi-110.
>>
>> At this point I find myself forced to make serious changes to the
>> program logic. Bey
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:24:23 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just making my first experiences in actually using srfi-110.
>
> At this point I find myself forced to make serious changes to the
> program logic. Beyond what's supported by simply configuring the sourc
Hi all,
I'm just making my first experiences in actually using srfi-110.
At this point I find myself forced to make serious changes to the
program logic. Beyond what's supported by simply configuring the source
code.
The worst thing I found that it will complain on the error port when
reading
