On Jul 22, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Phil M wrote:
Does each function (such as "MyCMethodConstructor") need to have a
unique name?
It's a map, right?
What would occur when two declarations map a unique RB method to a
function pointer named MyCMethodConstructor?
_
On Jul 22, 2006, at 8:33 AM, Alfred Van Hoek wrote:
Well, one of the other things that I am confused about is
declaring the method. Does the name of the method in C have to be
the same as the "description" written in the REALmethodDefinition?
(all examples I have seen have shown the same n
On Jul 22, 2006, at 7:50 AM, Phil M wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
I think all they are saying is to create several regular method
definitions for your class. Just name them "Constructor"
Well, one of the other things that I am confused about is declaring
the
REALmethodDefinition CSMethods[] = {
{ rp ED_CS_Constructor, 0, "Constructor(CharSet as ElfData)"
},
{ rp ED_CS_HasChar, 0, "HasChar(Char as integer) as
boolean" },
...
On Jul 21, 2006, at 8:52 PM
On Jul 21, 2006, at 8:52 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:
I think all they are saying is to create several regular method
definitions for your class. Just name them "Constructor"
Well, one of the other things that I am confused about is declaring
the method. Does the name of the method in C have
On Jul 21, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Phil M wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Christian Schmitz wrote:
Sorry, I am a little slow. Could you please give an example?
Just like in RB. Define methods as usual and name them Constructor
or class name.
For use of REALmethodDefinition, please check
Phil M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are only 7 examples in the SDK and none of them have overloaded
> constructors.
Well, I'm sorry, but I think overloaded constructors were added later
and examples are old. Just define methods like in RB and you are fine.
Over time you will learn that the
On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Christian Schmitz wrote:
Sorry, I am a little slow. Could you please give an example?
Just like in RB. Define methods as usual and name them Constructor
or class name.
For use of REALmethodDefinition, please check the examples.
There are only 7 examples in t
On 21 Jul 2006, at 21:24, Phil M wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Christian Schmitz wrote:
The documentation only seems to provide information for a default
(no
parameters) constructor and that is one that I *don't* want.
that's the initialiser which is always called.
Just define two
Phil M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I am a little slow. Could you please give an example?
Just like in RB. Define methods as usual and name them Constructor or
class name.
For use of REALmethodDefinition, please check the examples.
Gruß
Christian
--
Around eleven thousand functions in
On Jul 21, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Christian Schmitz wrote:
The documentation only seems to provide information for a default (no
parameters) constructor and that is one that I *don't* want.
that's the initialiser which is always called.
Just define two methods for your constructors.
Sorry, I am
Phil M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you overload a constructor for a class defined with
> REALclassDefinition? I would like to have the following:
>
> Constructor(p As Picture)
> Constructor(w as Width, h As Height)
>
> The documentation only seems to provide information for
How do you overload a constructor for a class defined with
REALclassDefinition? I would like to have the following:
Constructor(p As Picture)
Constructor(w as Width, h As Height)
The documentation only seems to provide information for a default (no
parameters) constructor and that i
13 matches
Mail list logo
