[REBOL] RF - New Article

2002-03-01 Thread Allen Kamp
Hi REBOLs, We have a new article from Joel this month. Metaphors: Bridges and Barriers http://www.rebolforces.com/articles/metaphors.html There is also a Forum just for RUBGY discussions. http://www.rebolforces.com/cgi-bin/aeforum-display-topics.cgi?discussion=7 Cheers, Allen K http://www.r

[REBOL] Re: RDC:FYI3

2002-03-01 Thread Carl Read
On 02-Mar-02, Boleslav Brezovský wrote: > :) Thank you Carl but I discarded myself from competition just > because no-one can beat me :) You could be right - all us others here just talk about coding. We don't ever actually do any. (; > (That was joke. Provided without ANY WARRANTY of ANY KIND.

[REBOL] seems my message got lost ... repost

2002-03-01 Thread Arnault Claden
Hey guys, I have a question, maybe a rtfm related one, but here it comes : I'm building a network monitoring tool for my work, but we use an authenticating proxy for http and ftp. I haven't read anywhere any info about this topic. Does any of you know how to authenticate myself when probing my w

[REBOL] Re: IMAP examples

2002-03-01 Thread Carl Read
On 02-Mar-02, Peter Carlsson wrote: > Hello! > I did not find any information on the REBOL homepage > about IMAP but the protocol seems to be implemented > in REBOL 2.5.0.3.1 (Windows). >>> probe next first system/schemes > [default Finger Whois Daytime SMTP POP IMAP HTTP FTP NNTP] >>> > I wo

[REBOL] Authenticating proxy and email robot

2002-03-01 Thread Arnault Claden
Hey guys, I have a question, maybe a rtfm related one, but here it comes : I'm building a network monitoring tool for my work, but we use an authenticating proxy for http and ftp. I haven't read anywhere any info about this topic. Does any of you know how to authenticate myself when probing my w

[REBOL] Rebol as a firewall

2002-03-01 Thread Terry Brownell
Any thoughts on how rebol could act as a firewall? TB -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.

[REBOL] Re: RDC:FYI3

2002-03-01 Thread Boleslav Brezovský
:) Thank you Carl but I discarded myself from competition just because no-one can beat me :) (That was joke. Provided without ANY WARRANTY of ANY KIND. Authors does not warrant that the joke will meet your requirements, or that the joke will be uninterrupted or error-free. Under no circumstances,

[REBOL] Re: ANN: VI/Emacs tag generator in/for REBOL

2002-03-01 Thread Andreas Bolka
Thursday, February 28, 2002, 2:25:37 PM, Maarten wrote: > Says it all, doesn't it. Made by my good friend Ernie, on the REB in > the script lib, category Advanced. yeah! ernie, my deepest gratitudes! ;) -- Best regards, Andreasmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsu

[REBOL] IMAP examples

2002-03-01 Thread Peter Carlsson
Hello! I did not find any information on the REBOL homepage about IMAP but the protocol seems to be implemented in REBOL 2.5.0.3.1 (Windows). >> probe next first system/schemes [default Finger Whois Daytime SMTP POP IMAP HTTP FTP NNTP] >> I would be very happy if someone could send me som exa

[REBOL] Re: loneliness

2002-03-01 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Patrick, Well, I've been gone for two days but I don't think I make that big of a difference. :) I came back to 50 ML messages, which seems fairly normal. I'm kind of glad there weren't too many more. :) --Gregg -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

[REBOL] Re: RDC:FYI3

2002-03-01 Thread Carl Read
On 02-Mar-02, bolek wrote: > Hurry up, time is running out! February has just ended and you've > got only two weeks till deadline. You want to be OFFICALLY FIRST > WINNER of REBOL/Demo competition? Still gotta chance! > Another flattering demo included, this time in 717 bytes (header > included)

[REBOL] Re: loneliness

2002-03-01 Thread Carl Read
On 02-Mar-02, pat665 wrote: > Hi rebollers, > Where are you ? I am receiving almost nothing from the list for two > days. Something happening ? What do you mean by "almost nothing"? If less than 20, then that's within normal fluctionations I think. ie, it fluctuates between less-than-twenty a

[REBOL] Re: Morpheus site

2002-03-01 Thread philb
Hi Petr, After reading all the news about Morpheus users being shut out the P2P network and how Morpheus was bringing out updated software in a few days, I couldnt quite decide if the update was the RT rewite on not. Seems like they are going to swap over which P2P network technology they are

[REBOL] Re: Presentation Dialect

2002-03-01 Thread G. Scott Jones
From: "Coussement Christophe" > Does anyone knows where I can find the presentation dialect ? Jeff's reb site or directly at: http://www.cs.unm.edu/~whip/make-presentation.r Regards, --Scott Jones -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" i

[REBOL] Presentation Dialect

2002-03-01 Thread Coussement Christophe
Hi List: Does anyone knows where I can find the presentation dialect ? thx, ===christophe -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.

[REBOL] RDC:FYI3

2002-03-01 Thread bolek
Hurry up, time is running out! February has just ended and you've got only two weeks till deadline. You want to be OFFICALLY FIRST WINNER of REBOL/Demo competition? Still gotta chance! Another flattering demo included, this time in 717 bytes (header included) --8<-cut here>8

[REBOL] Re: loneliness

2002-03-01 Thread G. Scott Jones
From: Patrick > Where are you ? I am receiving almost nothing from > the list for two days. Something happening ? Hi, Patrick, It has been eeriely quiet. I suspect that it is like the sound of one hand clapping: it is there; you just don't hear it. A while back. one of the main trunks in to Au

[REBOL] loneliness

2002-03-01 Thread pat665
Hi rebollers, Where are you ? I am receiving almost nothing from the list for two days. Something happening ? Patrick __ ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet ! vos emails depuis un navigateur, en

[REBOL] Re: Re Bug in delete?

2002-03-01 Thread Carl Read
On 01-Mar-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > While we're chipping in bugs in random, spot the difference in these > (reported to Feedback a while back) > random 2;; integer -- returns 1 or 2 > random 2x2 ;; pair -- returns 1x1, 1x2, 2x1 or 2x2 > random 2.2.2;; tuple -- returns 0.0.