RebOldes' code below is not as fast as possible yet, I think,
though less likely to write a bug by missing or adding
an extra [ next dir-port ], and it is less code to
maintain, still...
If you look at source delete, it is opening
a directory port to do its work.
Better to use remove on a direct
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 3:02:40 PM, you wrote:
TF> Anton Rolls wrote:
>>Looks pretty safe to me.
>>You are just in one directory.
>>This will delete all files with "editpost"
>>in the name somewhere.
>>I would catch errors while deleting the file
>>so you are not interrupted by a
Patrick wrote:
> - Do I need the get-word?
No.
> - Is there a difference in the result?
No.
> two syntaxes, the same results, what am I missing ?
The ":" in the get-word ":face" prevents the Rebol interpreter from
doing an extra evaluation step; that is, the evaluation associated with
words r
Hi Patrick,
PPln> In a previous version of my code, I was not using the get-word
PPln> ... and it was working the same (AFAICT).
PPln> So my questions are:
PPln> - Do I need the get-word?
PPln> - Is there a difference in the result?
If your FACE values are faces (objects), you don't need to us
Hi List,
Warning, this is a long post!
As often while coding some practical actions, I am faced with fundamentals questions.
I have some workarounds available, and it is not a matter of doing things.
What matters is understanding fully what I am doing and there is no better place to
ask...
The
