Oops, should be > 3 cases.
Anton.
> do select reduce [...] is only better in code-size
> for > ~8 cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
Actually, I will change it to your suggestion
for this situation, because with only two/three cases
to select from, it is more efficient code.
do select reduce [...] is only better in code-size
for > ~8 cases.
Anton.
> Hi Anton,
>
> On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, 3:00:06 PM, you wrote:
>
> A
Hi Konstantin,
Am Samstag 20 Dezember 2003 19:16 schrieb Konstantin Knizhnik:
> Hello Gregg,
>
> Saturday, December 20, 2003, 8:02:18 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> GI> Hi Konstantin,
>
> GI> Thanks for your continued efforts! Thanks to your code, and Romano's
> GI> detective work, it seems a bug in CLEAR
Hello Rebols:
I'm a parse-a-phobic, and use it infrequently.
The following function uses 'parse dialect, and appears
to work, but I'd appreciate a critique from anyone on
it. Given my unfamiliarity with parse, you just might
be preventing me from chasing a bug sometime:
Thanks!
Code follows:
Hello Konstantin,
Saturday, December 20, 2003, 9:28:25 PM, you wrote:
KK> Hello Robert,
KK> Saturday, December 20, 2003, 5:47:51 PM, you wrote:
RMM>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:49:40 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik
RMM>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> New optimized version of Rebol API to DyBASE is
Hello Robert,
Saturday, December 20, 2003, 5:47:51 PM, you wrote:
RMM> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:49:40 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik
RMM> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> New optimized version of Rebol API to DyBASE is available at
>> http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/dybase.html
>> I was managed to incr
Hello Gregg,
Saturday, December 20, 2003, 8:02:18 PM, you wrote:
GI> Hi Konstantin,
GI> Thanks for your continued efforts! Thanks to your code, and Romano's
GI> detective work, it seems a bug in CLEAR with hash! values may have
GI> been found, which is great!
GI> Also, some of us have talked
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for your continued efforts! Thanks to your code, and Romano's
detective work, it seems a bug in CLEAR with hash! values may have
been found, which is great!
Also, some of us have talked about things a bit, and an expert opinion
is that REBOL's prototype object approach just
Hello Gabriele,
Thursday, December 18, 2003, 10:42:33 AM, you wrote:
GS> Hi rebOldes,
GS> On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 6:09:34 PM, you wrote:
r>> I can, but it's much more slower and it would mean to make it
r>> completely again. Maybe I could use load/next but how to convert
r>> invalid wo
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:49:40 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New optimized version of Rebol API to DyBASE is available at
> http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/dybase.html
> I was managed to increase speed of testindex.r example 4 times by
> optimizing work with hash tables.
Hello Robert,
With the help of Rebol mail list members, I was able to significantly
improve performance of Rebol API. Now the difference with for example
Python, is not so high. I do not believe that it is possible to do
something more in improving performance. Certainly it is possible to
speed u
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:45:05 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I improve my own "record".
> Looks like the best solution (not only for this example) is:
> ...
Hi, for this version I get:
Elapsed time for adding 20 records 0:00:01.452
--
Robert M. Münch
Management &
Hi Gabriele
Could you send this message to the list.
I hope that you wil have the nicest chrismas.
sincerly
Philippe Arsenne
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de
Gabriele Santilli
Envoyé : jeudi 18 décembre 2003 10:55
À : Jason Cunliffe
Objet
13 matches
Mail list logo
