[REBOL] Re: REBOL for Pocket PC

2004-05-09 Thread Brian Hawley
Hi Stuart! The answer is yes, sort-of. Core 2.5.0.15.5 will work, with some caveats: - This is a WinCE 2.0 program. It will run on later versions of WinCE but it still looks a little archaic. - WinCE has no concept of a current directory at all. REBOL HOME is thus the root directory, and t

[REBOL] Re: [The Gimp] clashes with REBOL on Windows 2000

2004-05-09 Thread Brian Hawley
Hi Anton, I just ran REBOL/View from my REBOL home directory to test the default install behavior. I was able to rename rebol.exe to another file name (blah.bak) and then write out a random file downloaded from a remote web site to a file named rebol.exe . You don't have to delete the file for th

[REBOL] Re: [The Gimp] clashes with REBOL on Windows 2000

2004-05-09 Thread Anton Rolls
I just tried opening a copy of my rebol.exe, named rebolblah.exe and within the rebol console to delete %rebolblah.exe. This produces a write access error. As far as I know you can't modify a running executable. That's on WindowsXP. I can't remember if Win9x allows that. Anyone ? Anton. > The i

[REBOL] Re: REBOL for Pocket PC

2004-05-09 Thread SunandaDH
Stuart: > Is there in fact a port of REBOl for Pocket PC 2002/2003? This recent thread suggests Core will run on a Pocket PC: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/ml-display-thread.r?m=rmlCFZQ See also the REBOL FAQ http://www.rebol.com/faq.html Sunanda -- To unsubscribe from this lis