--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If the two Rebol programs can't communicate
> directly,
> > have them write to a .TXT file, and the other
> would look
> > for keywords do do something, write something else
> to
> > the file, etc,etc.
> >
> > I have tried and used Rebol
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think their special $49 pricing on View/Pro is
> gone, so it might be $99
> > now, but still not an outrageous fee if you need
> those features.
> >
> > --Gregg
> >
>
> However... in this mailing-list many people ask to
> Carl to make
> fr
FWIW, my earlier message on this thread represented an
incorrect understanding; launch can be used in the
console and scripts launched through the console, but
not in scripts invoked via the REBOL command line; not
sure about using the /View interface.
This makes it, as others have noted, less t
--- Gregg Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Allesandro,
>
> <<
> I was very interested to the function "launch" (I
> didn't know it).
>
> But I didn't find enought documentation about it.
> Can someone tell me more about launch refiniments?
> (this function could
> be used to simulate a mul
--- RebOldes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shift: func [
> "Takes a base-2 binary string and shifts bits"
> data [string! binary!] places [integer!] /left
> /right
> ][
> data: enbase/base data 2
> either right [
> remove/part tail data negate places
> data: he
--- Volker Nitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so why should rebol implement a more and more
> deprecated feature? ;)
I wasn't saying it should, just that it might be a
difference that someone whose expectations were
formed by C++.
__
Do You
--- Volker Nitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 22:14 schrieb Christopher
> Dicely:
> > --- Abdel Belkasri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Anton,
> > >
> > > 1- Can I create my own cu
--- Abdel Belkasri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anton,
>
> 1- Can I create my own custom object?
Sure.
foo: make object! [
.
.
.
]
That'll create an object. It works much like an
object in a "real" OO language -- it can have
data members, methods, etc. The big thing it misses
compared
--- Christian Langreiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there such a beast or must one write a function
> to do it?
>
> round: func [x] [to-integer .5 + x]
This has results which are probably undesired with
negative inputs.
Chris Dicely
__
Do
--- Mat Bettinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> >> print to-integer 1.6
> 1
>
> I can't for the life of me find a word which does
> the same as this but
> which actually rounds (so you'd get 2) rather than
> just chopping off
> the remainder.
>
> Is there such a beast or must one wri
--- Gregg Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Louis,
>
> << Thanks! But I haven't been able to figure out
> how to use it. Would you
> please give me a sample usage? >>
>
> DOH! I was going to post a simple reply, but it
> appears you've outsmarted
> me. :) If there's only a decimal compone
--- Carl Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I understand it, (ie - probably wrongly:), the
> IOS/Morpheus link will enable Morpheus to rightly
> claim they're more than just a file-sharing service
> because they'll be providing distributed computing
> as well. Unless the law is an ass, t
--- Jason Cunliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I need to build a secure client-side tool in
> REBOLfor people to upload files
> to a remote server. I would like to use REBOL/View
> so I can offer an easy
> GUI for fiel browsing, selection and transfer. An
> option I see using REBOL
> are:
>
> -
--- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I hope this is a tongue-in-cheek comment! If not,
> you are making the fatal error that practically
> every computer scientist has made at one point or
> another: expecting that human beings will modify
> their behaviour to suit the computer rather
--- Andrew Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> > The above works as a script unto itself, but
> within the larger script, I
> get the following error message...
> >
> > "Launch can only be used by launcher programs" in
> a REBOL/View Dialog Box.
> >
> > Since 'launch is undocumented
--- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #Friday 14 December 2001 18:17# Message from
> Christopher Dicely:
> >
> > I haven't used parse much, but it seems like a
> fairly
> > trivial application of it.
Well, no, it wasn't, and I actually meant to
ba
--- Joel Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Doug,
>
> "Vos, Doug" wrote:
> >
> ...
> > try this at the prompt. - Test for leap year
> > >> 29-Feb-1999
> > ** Syntax Error: Invalid date -- 29-Feb-1999
> > ** Near: (line 1) 29-Feb-1999
> >
> > However there is a leap year in 2000,
> > so reb
--- Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [Been busy this week... still have to catch up on
> emails...]
>
> chaz wrote:
>
> > Since a Tourist can carry baggage, wouldn't he be
> a special case of a Mail
> > Agent who can only carry his own objects?
>
> There are two differences: Mail
--- James Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Problems exist when you want agents to be able to
> interact with each other
> and their environment - it is the interaction itself
> that can be a security
> risk as stated earlier, hence the need for some
> level of shell which is not
--- Petr Krenzelok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Dicely wrote:
>
> >
> >You could probably do it in /Core or /View with
> >a seperate native program to handle launching
> >that the REBOL could talk to via TCP/IP, but
> >that limits port
--- James Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Gabriele,
>
> On further consideration REBOL is perhaps not the
> safest choice of language for this sort of project
> as there are lots of security issues involved due
> to its self-modifying abilities.
As best I can tell, given REBOL's usu
I'm pretty much a newbie, but can't you pass a
reference using a literal word? I.e., instead
of
big-block: [ lots of data ]
some-random-function big-block
do something like:
big-block: [ lots of data ]
some-random-function 'big-block
Chris Dicely
--- Nate Haggard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Patrick Philipot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be more practical, if I have a button like this
> on a window.
>
>
> button "show me" [display]
>
> I want the function display to be :
> - a simple test function when debuging or
> - a function that shows a photo or
> - a function that dis
--- Paul Tretter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.reboltech.com/plugins.html for the REBOL
> plugin.
Right, but that doesn't tell us about the priority
or progress on getting something that works with newer
version of IE (which still supports plugin-like
functionality via ActiveX, even t
24 matches
Mail list logo
