Very Nice! Only problem I see is that it uses some keys that
are not available in other platforms or keyboards; ie. insert.
Maybe a different key combination will be more portable.
Cheers, Jaime
-- The best way to predict the future is to invent it -- Alan Kay
On May 4, 2004, at 3:59 AM, Alain
Thank you all for the input. Below is a new version of dump-bin that
includes Ashley's suggestions. Hallvard you got my permission to
include in prob.r.
Greg, I think your suggestion that probe should produce output
similar to dump-bin by default is great. I hope Carl goes for it.
Finally, I
I have being working with binaries a lot lately so I created this
tool that lets you examine the contents of a binary in a more
explicit way that you using probe.
Please critique my code so that I can improve it.
Thank you, and enjoy -- Jaime
dump-binary: func ['buffer /local v b t c r pad pl l
Thanks Chris for your correction, it great to have well
informed people in this list!
Cheers, Jaime
-- The best way to predict the future is to invent it -- Alan Kay
On Jan 29, 2004, at 2:56 PM, Christian Morency wrote:
>
>
>> Jaime Vargas wrote:
>> -- The best way to predic
I think it is worth. It will help with some applications that are
doing a lot
of different things all the time. It is kind of nice to invoke a thread
let
it run in the background a yield back to the gui and only waiting for
completion of the thread. Don't know about performance though. If
it
DJ, You probably can get Rebol/Core for 3.3 to run on 3.0. You just
need to link to the proper libc. I will try to test this and let the
list
know.
Regarding 3.4-- the problem is that RT needs to generate new
distros. OpenBSD has changed from a.out binary format to ELF.
ELF was used for all t
Hallvard,
You can possibly use id: checksum/secure read url and
this id as a unique hash identifier for the page. With use this id
to index your database, and If two URLs have the exact
same content you will obtain the same checksum and you can
then add the new URL reference to the db without a
Hi Robert, MD5 checksums will not work for slightly mutating content.
We need some sort of fuzzy signature to classify the spam. Also there
should be a very fast an efficient protocol to consult the central
database
for this "signatures".
IMHO I think it would be best to have the centralized s
