To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: SMTP authentication - the answer - but another
question
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
> both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with
Hi Scott,
I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with my
authenticating servers. MS are not known to lead the pack in this area so
surely there is standardisation of sorts, (even if it is MS sorts)
Nic
Hi Scott and Brett,
Thanks for your suggestions - I took it to 'feedback' and got -
> "REBOL does not currently support SMTP authorization though your request
has been added to our protocol enhancement list.
> If you can't possibly wait, the SMTP protocol in REBOL is writtin in REBOL
and can th
Nope - still no good I'm afraid. I think the problem is not how to pass the
user name and password to the SMTP scheme - I think the problem is the way
the scheme uses them. Trouble is I cannot understand the code well enough
to work out what's going on!
Thanks for help so far,
Nick.
-Orig
ary to do a POP read first.
Over time I think we will see most SMTP servers require authentication in
order to prevent spamming so a solution is going to be required at some
point. Any more ideas?
Regards,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be
Hi, I'm new to Rebol and have a problem with SMTP authentication which my
mail server requires but the Send function does not appear to include.
I've tried a POP read first but it doesn't help.
I've done a fair bit of RFMing but no luck.
The documentation for SMTP doesn't refer to authenticatio