: Sunday, May 16, 2004 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: [ANN] [REBOL.org] [ML] Indexing the Mailing List
Robert
A very interesting suggestion. As Sunanda suggested it may be worth a
"computers versus humans" challenge. Given my ignorance of REBOL and
Bayes filters, I f
Robert
A very interesting suggestion. As Sunanda suggested it may be worth a
"computers versus humans" challenge. Given my ignorance of REBOL and
Bayes filters, I for one had better stick to the manual tagging team.
:-)
I'm sure there would be some value in some "intelligent" scripts which
Hi Robert,
> Hi, I think this is a tremendous work and I'm thinking if your resources
> shouldn't be used for other things. Some time ago I posted a request about
> Bayes filters etc. IMO it should be possible to use those 1200 taged
> messages as the base to train a bayes filter and th
On Fri, 14 May 2004 10:55:01 -0600, Gregg Irwin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just recently Sunanda posted his message about tagging the ML index at
> REBOL.org. In the short time since, the tag team (Peter Wood,
> Christian Ensel, and Sunanda -- did I miss anyone?) have pushed the
> number of t
Jason:
> hmm.. Please can you post the TAG guidelines message again here now.
There aren't any guidelines as such. Other than something like: be clear, be
simple, don't use too many.
Better guidelines will emerge as part of the tagging exercise. We don't
really know how to best label somethi
> THANKS TAG TEAM!
Yes Gregg this is great news. Thanks TAG Team !!
> 2) Read Sunanda's message again and see how tags work; then use them
> here when you post messages. Taking an extra minute to come up
> with appropriate tags means the tag team won't constantly be
> playi
GI> Just recently Sunanda posted his message about tagging the ML index at
GI> REBOL.org. In the short time since, the tag team (Peter Wood,
GI> Christian Ensel, and Sunanda -- did I miss anyone?) ...
I missed Gerard Cote! Sorry Gerard!
-- Gregg
--
To unsubscribe from
