>
>
> There is no notion of current context.
> The same function can be referenced by words
> in two different objects, can't it?
> Therefore, which context is "current"?
yeah you're right, I'd forgotten that once bind is done, the function itself does not
have any knowledge of context... each
There is no notion of current context.
The same function can be referenced by words
in two different objects, can't it?
Therefore, which context is "current"?
It's probably infeasible to add a complete
undo function, but perhaps an /original
refinement might be good so you don't have
to remember
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 11:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: [encompass.r]
>
>
>
> Max:
>
> > Anyone... What is the best way for a funct
Max:
> Anyone... What is the best way for a function to detect if it is part of an
> object?
One way would be to check if 'self is defined.
Sunanda.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.
ursday, November 27, 2003 6:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: [encompass.r]
>
>
>
> How about encompass stores the old function
> name and function definition in a list maintained
> within itself, so you can /restore later.
> Just an idea.
>
> Anton
How about encompass stores the old function
name and function definition in a list maintained
within itself, so you can /restore later.
Just an idea.
Anton.
> Hi all,
>
>
> I just wanted to let everyone know of a nifty function I just
> uploaded to the rebol.r repository, it is called emcomp
