I was introduced to 'load to replace using "do read". Since 'load also
takes strings and blocks, it can also replace "do to-block".
- Michael Jelinek
On 04-May-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FYI when using to-block, the block was being created (as data only),
> but in order for the assignmen
On 04-May-01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FYI when using to-block, the block was being created (as data only),
> but in order for the assignment to happen it needed to be executed
> (as code).
> - Michael Jelinek
I knew it was something like that, but it's hardy intuitive that
'to-block isn't th
com on 05/03/2001 07:12 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: [REBOL] Re: A bug or a feature?
On 03-May-01, Graham Chiu wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2001 20:36:37 +1200
> Carl Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
On 03-May-01, Graham Chiu wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2001 20:36:37 +1200
> Carl Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> test: to-block {a: text "hello"}
>> == [a: text "hello"]
> try test: load {a: text "hello" }
Thanks Graham - that did the trick - and I never wouldn't thought to
use load o
On Thu, 03 May 2001 20:36:37 +1200
Carl Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> test: to-block {a: text "hello"}
> == [a: text "hello"]
try test: load {a: text "hello" }
> And if so, how would you convert a string to a block so
> the 'a:
> above would be set?
--
Graham Chiu
--
To unsub
